Paper · 2009 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Influence of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) flour quality and Chinese noodle quality

Dongyun Ma; Tiancai Guo; Zhijie Wang; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: Understanding wheat flour noodle quality responses to N management will improve the quality of recommendations made to growers for specific end‐uses. Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates, planted during the course of a 2‐year experiment were used to determine the effect of N application rate on Chinese white noodle quality. RESULTS: Wheat flour protein content, development time (DT) and stability time (ST) increased with N application rate, maximal at 360 kg N ha −1 and decreasing thereafter. When the N fertilizer application rate changed from 0 to 270 or 360 kg N ha −1 , redness ( a *) and yellowness ( b *) of both flour and noodle increased, while brightness ( L *) decreased. The hardness and chewiness of cooked noodles improved at lower N application rate and degenerated at higher N rate. CONCLUSION: A low rate of N fertilizer application (from 0 to 270 kg N ha −1 ) improved flour quality. Flour protein content and protein quality parameters displayed a significant negative correlation with brightness ( L *) values. Generally, high flour protein content and protein quality, as well as good noodle texture, could be achieved by topdressing N fertilizer (in the range 270–360 kg N ha −1 ). Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flour protein content, development time and stability time of winter wheat increased with N application rate, maximal at 360 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N application ratee1
Outcome
Wheat flour protein content, development time (DT) and stability time (ST)e1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
maximal at 360 kg N ha −1 and decreasing thereaftere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat flour protein content, development time (DT) and stability time (ST) increased with N application rate, maximal at 360 kg N ha −1 and decreasing thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising N fertilizer from 0 to 270 or 360 kg N ha-1 increased redness and yellowness of winter wheat flour and noodle.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N fertilizer application ratee2
Outcome
redness ( a *) and yellowness ( b *) of both flour and noodlee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–215 · show in text ↑
e2

“When the N fertilizer application rate changed from 0 to 270 or 360 kg N ha −1 , redness ( a *) and yellowness ( b *) of both flour and noodle increased, while brightness ( L *) decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising N fertilizer from 0 to 270 or 360 kg N ha-1 decreased brightness of winter wheat flour and noodle.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N fertilizer application ratee2
Outcome
brightness ( L *)e2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–215 · show in text ↑
e2

“When the N fertilizer application rate changed from 0 to 270 or 360 kg N ha −1 , redness ( a *) and yellowness ( b *) of both flour and noodle increased, while brightness ( L *) decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness and chewiness of cooked noodles improved at lower N application rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
lower N application ratee3
Outcome
hardness and chewiness of cooked noodlese3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
higher N ratee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–215 · show in text ↑
e3

“The hardness and chewiness of cooked noodles improved at lower N application rate and degenerated at higher N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness and chewiness of cooked noodles degenerated at higher N application rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
higher N ratee3
Outcome
hardness and chewiness of cooked noodlese3
Direction
degeneratede3
Comparator
lower N application ratee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–215 · show in text ↑
e3

“The hardness and chewiness of cooked noodles improved at lower N application rate and degenerated at higher N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A low rate of N fertilizer application, 0 to 270 kg N ha-1, improved winter wheat flour quality.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
low rate of N fertilizer applicatione6
Outcome
flour qualitye6
Direction
improvede6
Value
0 to 270 kg N ha −1e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–215 · show in text ↑
e6

“A low rate of N fertilizer application (from 0 to 270 kg N ha −1 ) improved flour quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–933 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flour protein content of winter wheat was significantly negatively correlated with brightness.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
Floure4
Outcome
brightness ( L *) valuese4
Direction
negative correlatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–215 · show in text ↑
e4

“Flour protein content and protein quality parameters displayed a significant negative correlation with brightness ( L *) values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1062 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressing N fertilizer in the range 270-360 kg N ha-1 could achieve high flour protein content, protein quality and good noodle texture in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
topdressing N fertilizere5
Value
270–360 kg N ha −1e5
Qualifier
high flour protein content and protein quality, as well as good noodle texturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two winter wheat cultivars, with six N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–215 · show in text ↑
e5

“high flour protein content and protein quality, as well as good noodle texture, could be achieved by topdressing N fertilizer (in the range 270–360 kg N ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1235 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 21 positive, 7 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 146 positive, 27 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.