Paper · 2000 · Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Determination of Optimum Level of Phosphorus and its Effect on Growth, Yield and Quality of Ratoon Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)

Aman Ullah Chaudhry; F.A. Chattha

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The various components of the sugarcane crop such as stripped cane yield, number of millable canes and unstripped cane yield were affected significantly by different levels of phosphorus. Phosphorus application in the range of 100-150 kg haG 1 along with 200 kg haG 1 and 150 kg K 2 O haG 1 was found to be an optimum dose. Phosphorus application beyond the range of 100 to 150 kg haG 1 will not be profitable. Phosphorus had nonsignificant effect on the photo biomass and quality parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus levels significantly affected stripped cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
different levels of phosphoruse0
Outcome
stripped cane yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“stripped cane yield, number of millable canes and unstripped cane yield were affected significantly by different levels of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus levels significantly affected the number of millable canes.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
different levels of phosphoruse0
Outcome
number of millable canese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“stripped cane yield, number of millable canes and unstripped cane yield were affected significantly by different levels of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus levels significantly affected unstripped cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
different levels of phosphoruse0
Outcome
unstripped cane yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“stripped cane yield, number of millable canes and unstripped cane yield were affected significantly by different levels of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–135 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 100-150 kg haG 1 phosphorus with accompanying fertilizer as optimal.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Phosphorus application in the range of 100-150 kg haG 1 along with 200 kg haG 1 and 150 kg K 2 O haG 1e0
Outcome
optimum dosee0

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application in the range of 100-150 kg haG 1 along with 200 kg haG 1 and 150 kg K 2 O haG 1 was found to be an optimum dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–135 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus above 100 to 150 kg haG 1 was judged unprofitable.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Phosphorus application beyond the range of 100 to 150 kg haG 1e0
Outcome
will not be profitablee0

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application beyond the range of 100 to 150 kg haG 1 will not be profitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus had a nonsignificant effect on photo biomass.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
photo biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus had nonsignificant effect on the photo biomass and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus had a nonsignificant effect on quality parameters.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus had nonsignificant effect on the photo biomass and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–135 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.