Paper · 1976 · Agronomy Journal

Response of Sugarcane to Filter Press Mud and N, P, and K Fertilizers. I. Effect on Sugarcane Yield and Sucrose Content1

M. Prasad

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Very little information is available regarding the plant nutrient value of filter press mud (FPM) for sugarcane. Yield increases of sugarcane as a result of FPM application have been inconsistent. Therefore eight field experiments were conducted to study the effect of FPM and NPK fertilizer, and their interaction on the yield and sucrose content of sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.). There were four plant cane and four ratoon experiments conducted over 2 years on seven sites. These included one experiment in which the residual effect of FPM after 1 year was studied. A split plot design was used with FPM on main plots (rates were 0, 20, and 40 metric tons/ha or 0 and 34 metric tons/ha dry wt with two or four replications), and N, P, and K fertilizer rates on subplots (two or four replications). The rates of fertilizers were as follows: N = 0, 94, and 188 kg/ha or 47, 94, and 141 kg/ha; P = 0, 45, and 90 kg/ha or 0 and 45 kg/ha; K = 0 and 112 kg/ha. Filter press mud increased the yield of cane in six experiments including the residual FPM experiment. Yield increases were higher in plant than in ratoon cane. Nitrogen increased the yield of cane in all experiments and in five experiments, rates higher than 94 kg N/ha, the standard practice, gave higher yield. The response of sugarcane to N‐fertilizer was more related to the texture of the soil (r = −0.79) than N‐content of the soil. Phosphorus increased the yield in seven experiments. Potassium gave a response in two out of five experiments. FPM ✕ P was the most interesting interaction and occurred in six experiments. This interaction reflected the inter‐changeability of FPM at the rates studied with P‐fertilizer. Other significant interactions were FPM ✕ N ✕ K, FPM ✕ N ✕ P. Filter press mud also improved the quality of the cane in four experiments while P‐fertilizer improved it in three. On basis of these results, the following is recommended: 1) No P‐fertilizer need be applied where FPM has been applied in quantities as high as 20 metric tons/ha dry wt basis, 2) ratoons following the plant cane may need P‐fertilizer but possibly in much smaller amounts than normal, particularly if FPM rates are high, and 3) rates greater than 94 kg/ha are recommended particularly in the coarser textured soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Filter press mud increased cane yield in six experiments, including a residual-effect experiment.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Filter press mude0
Outcome
yield of canee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
six experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Filter press mud increased the yield of cane in six experiments including the residual FPM experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increases from filter press mud were higher in plant than ratoon cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
plante0
Outcome
Yield increasese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ratoon canee0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increases were higher in plant than in ratoon cane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1134 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased cane yield in all experiments.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Nitrogene0
Outcome
yield of canee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen increased the yield of cane in all experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In five experiments, nitrogen rates above 94 kg N/ha gave higher cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
rates higher than 94 kg N/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
94 kg N/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“in five experiments, rates higher than 94 kg N/ha, the standard practice, gave higher yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1287 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrogen fertilizer response related more to soil texture than soil nitrogen content.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
N‐fertilizere0
Outcome
response of sugarcanee0
Value
r = −0.79e0
Comparator
N‐content of the soile0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The response of sugarcane to N‐fertilizer was more related to the texture of the soil (r = −0.79) than N‐content of the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus increased cane yield in seven experiments.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
seven experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus increased the yield in seven experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1466 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium produced a response in two of five experiments.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Potassiume0
Outcome
responsee0
Value
two out of five experimentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium gave a response in two out of five experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1524 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The filter press mud by phosphorus interaction occurred in six experiments and indicated interchangeability.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
FPM ✕ Pe0
Value
six experimentse0
Qualifier
inter‐changeability of FPM at the rates studied with P‐fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“FPM ✕ P was the most interesting interaction and occurred in six experiments. This interaction reflected the inter‐changeability of FPM at the rates studied with P‐fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1700 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Filter press mud by nitrogen by potassium and filter press mud by nitrogen by phosphorus interactions were significant.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
FPM ✕ N ✕ K, FPM ✕ N ✕ Pe0

Verbatim

e0

“Other significant interactions were FPM ✕ N ✕ K, FPM ✕ N ✕ P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1762 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Filter press mud improved cane quality in four experiments.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Filter press mude0
Outcome
quality of the canee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
four experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Filter press mud also improved the quality of the cane in four experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilizer improved cane quality in three experiments.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
P‐fertilizere0
Outcome
quality of the canee1
Direction
improvede0
Value
threee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P‐fertilizer improved it in three.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1878 · show in text ↑
e1

“quality of the cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1817 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend omitting phosphorus fertilizer when filter press mud is applied at 20 metric tons per hectare dry weight.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
No P‐fertilizer need be appliede0
Qualifier
FPM has been applied in quantities as high as 20 metric tons/ha dry wt basise0

Verbatim

e0

“No P‐fertilizer need be applied where FPM has been applied in quantities as high as 20 metric tons/ha dry wt basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1939–2053 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest ratoons following plant cane may need less phosphorus fertilizer than normal, especially at high filter press mud rates.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
may need P‐fertilizer but possibly in much smaller amounts than normale0
Qualifier
particularly if FPM rates are highe0

Verbatim

e0

“ratoons following the plant cane may need P‐fertilizer but possibly in much smaller amounts than normal, particularly if FPM rates are high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2197 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend nitrogen rates above 94 kg/ha, particularly on coarser textured soils.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
rates greater than 94 kg/ha are recommendede0
Qualifier
particularly in the coarser textured soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“rates greater than 94 kg/ha are recommended particularly in the coarser textured soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2206–2292 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–397 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 55 positive, 2 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.