Paper · 1987 · Madras Agricultural Journal

EFFECT OF NPK AND FARM COMPOST ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGARCANE

DURAISAMY .; RANI PERUMAL P; BASKARAN S; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil test crop response field experiments were conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Fram, Bhavenisagar on red non-calcareous soil (typic usterthent) with sugarcane CóC. 671 as test crop. The influences of N.P.K and farm compost on cane and sugar yields and quality parameters were studied. The results indicated that N, K, and farm compost appli- cation significantly influenced the cone and sugar yield while. P had no effect. Quality para- meters viz., purity, sucrose and commercial cane sugar were favourably improved by the addition of K. Nitrogen addition at lower levels slightly increased the CCS per cent where- as the other parameters were not altered.. Phosphorus and farm compost applications had not exerted any influence on quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen significantly influenced cane and sugar yield.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
cone and sugar yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that N, K, and farm compost appli- cation significantly influenced the cone and sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium significantly influenced cane and sugar yield.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Ke0
Outcome
cone and sugar yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that N, K, and farm compost appli- cation significantly influenced the cone and sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm compost significantly influenced cane and sugar yield.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
farm compost appli- catione0
Outcome
cone and sugar yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that N, K, and farm compost appli- cation significantly influenced the cone and sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus had no effect on sugarcane yields.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
cone and sugar yielde1
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–438 · show in text ↑
e1

“the cone and sugar yield while. P had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium improved purity, sucrose and commercial cane sugar.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
addition of Ke0
Outcome
purity, sucrose and commercial cane sugare0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Quality para- meters viz., purity, sucrose and commercial cane sugar were favourably improved by the addition of K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen application slightly increased CCS percentage.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Nitrogen addition at lower levelse0
Outcome
CCS per cente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen addition at lower levels slightly increased the CCS per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen did not alter other quality parameters.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Nitrogen addition at lower levelse1
Outcome
other parameterse0
Direction
not alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“where- as the other parameters were not altered..”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–674 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen addition at lower levels slightly increased the CCS per cent where- as the other parameters were not altered..”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus did not influence quality.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
not exerted any influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus and farm compost applications had not exerted any influence on quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm compost did not influence quality.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
farm composte0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
not exerted any influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus and farm compost applications had not exerted any influence on quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 20 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.