Paper · 2010 · Plant Disease

Influence of Inoculation Date on the Colonization of Xylella fastidiosa and the Persistence of Almond Leaf Scorch Disease Among Almond Cultivars

Tiesen Cao; Joseph H. Connell; Margot Wilhelm; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis cvs. Butte, Carmel, Mission, Ne Plus Ultra, Padre, Peerless, Price, Solano, Sonora, and Thompson) were mechanically inoculated with Xylella fastidiosa in the growing seasons of 2002 and 2003 to study the effect of inoculation date on the movement and colonization of X. fastidiosa and the overwintering persistence of almond leaf scorch disease (ALS) in these cultivars. X. fastidiosa was inoculated into the base of current-season growing shoots in April, May, June, July, August, September, and October. Almond trees inoculated in spring months developed more ALS-symptomatic leaves and more extensive within-plant spread of X. fastidiosa by the end of the current growing season compared with trees inoculated in July, August, September, and October. Trees inoculated in June developed the most severe ALS symptoms during the season in which they were inoculated. Trees inoculated in June and July 2002 had significantly higher disease ratings in 2003 than inoculations made in August and October 2002. Based on disease ratings observed in 2003, 1 year after inoculation, Sonora and Solano were the most ALS susceptible, Mission and Price intermediate, and Carmel, Padre, Ne Plus Ultra, Butte, Peerless, and Thompson were the least susceptible cultivars for allowing X. fastidiosa to overwinter and cause disease the following year. Assessment of all trees in August 2004 indicated that trees inoculated in June and July 2002 had a significantly higher amount of ALS-infected branches than trees inoculated in other months. Butte, Carmel, Padre, and Thompson cultivars had no symptomatic branches, while X. fastidiosa infections persisted or colonized new branches in Sonora, Solano, Peerless, Price, Mission, and Ne Plus Ultra. Based on the 2004 assessment, Sonora was the most susceptible cultivar. Surveys of a diseased orchard in Chico, CA showed large differences in ALS incidence in four almond cultivars. Nonpareil and Peerless had significantly greater incidence of disease than Butte and Carmel over the 2 years surveyed. These data suggest that cultivar susceptibility and the time of X. fastidiosa infection are important factors in determining the persistence of ALS in almond trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Almond trees inoculated in spring months developed more ALS-symptomatic leaves than trees inoculated in July to October.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
inoculated in spring monthse1
Interactor
X. fastidiosaXylella fastidiosae1pathogen
Outcome
ALS-symptomatic leavese1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
trees inoculated in July, August, September, and Octobere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xylella fastidiosa
Xylella fastidiosa · InteractorValentain12 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Almond trees inoculated in spring months developed more ALS-symptomatic leaves and more extensive within-plant spread of X. fastidiosa by the end of the current growing season compared with trees inoculated in July, August, September, and October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Almond trees inoculated in spring months had more extensive within-plant spread of X. fastidiosa than trees inoculated in July to October.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
inoculated in spring monthse1
Interactor
X. fastidiosaXylella fastidiosae1pathogen
Outcome
within-plant spreade1
Direction
more extensivee1
Comparator
trees inoculated in July, August, September, and Octobere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xylella fastidiosa
Xylella fastidiosa · InteractorValentain12 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Almond trees inoculated in spring months developed more ALS-symptomatic leaves and more extensive within-plant spread of X. fastidiosa by the end of the current growing season compared with trees inoculated in July, August, September, and October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees inoculated in June developed the most severe ALS symptoms during the season of inoculation.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
Trees inoculated in Junee2
Outcome
ALS symptomse2
Direction
most severee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“Trees inoculated in June developed the most severe ALS symptoms during the season in which they were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees inoculated in June and July 2002 had significantly higher disease ratings in 2003 than trees inoculated in August and October 2002.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
Trees inoculated in June and July 2002e3
Outcome
disease ratings in 2003e3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
inoculations made in August and October 2002e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“Trees inoculated in June and July 2002 had significantly higher disease ratings in 2003 than inoculations made in August and October 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1055 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sonora and Solano were the most ALS susceptible almond cultivars.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Sonora and Solanoe4
Outcome
most ALS susceptiblee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sonora and Solano were the most ALS susceptible, Mission and Price intermediate, and Carmel, Padre, Ne Plus Ultra, Butte, Peerless, and Thompson were the least susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mission and Price were intermediate in ALS susceptibility.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Mission and Pricee4
Outcome
ALS susceptiblee4
Qualifier
intermediatee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sonora and Solano were the most ALS susceptible, Mission and Price intermediate, and Carmel, Padre, Ne Plus Ultra, Butte, Peerless, and Thompson were the least susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carmel, Padre, and Ne Plus Ultra were the least susceptible cultivars to ALS.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Carmel, Padre, Ne Plus Ultrae4
Outcome
least susceptiblee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sonora and Solano were the most ALS susceptible, Mission and Price intermediate, and Carmel, Padre, Ne Plus Ultra, Butte, Peerless, and Thompson were the least susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butte, Peerless, and Thompson were the least susceptible cultivars to ALS.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Butte, Peerless, and Thompsone4
Outcome
least susceptiblee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sonora and Solano were the most ALS susceptible, Mission and Price intermediate, and Carmel, Padre, Ne Plus Ultra, Butte, Peerless, and Thompson were the least susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees inoculated in June and July 2002 had a higher amount of ALS-infected branches in August 2004 than trees inoculated in other months.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
trees inoculated in June and July 2002e5
Outcome
ALS-infected branchese5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
trees inoculated in other monthse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e5

“trees inoculated in June and July 2002 had a significantly higher amount of ALS-infected branches than trees inoculated in other months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1576 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butte, Carmel, Padre, and Thompson had no symptomatic branches in 2004.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Butte, Carmel, Padre, and Thompsone6
Outcome
symptomatic branchese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e6

“Butte, Carmel, Padre, and Thompson cultivars had no symptomatic branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1650 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X. fastidiosa infections persisted or colonized new branches in Sonora, Solano, and Peerless.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Sonora, Solano, Peerlesse7
Interactor
X. fastidiosaXylella fastidiosae7pathogen
Outcome
X. fastidiosa infectionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xylella fastidiosa
Xylella fastidiosa · InteractorValentain12 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e7

“X. fastidiosa infections persisted or colonized new branches in Sonora, Solano, Peerless, Price, Mission, and Ne Plus Ultra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X. fastidiosa infections persisted or colonized new branches in Price, Mission, and Ne Plus Ultra.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Price, Mission, and Ne Plus Ultrae7
Interactor
X. fastidiosaXylella fastidiosae7pathogen
Outcome
X. fastidiosa infectionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xylella fastidiosa
Xylella fastidiosa · InteractorValentain12 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e7

“X. fastidiosa infections persisted or colonized new branches in Sonora, Solano, Peerless, Price, Mission, and Ne Plus Ultra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sonora was the most susceptible cultivar in the 2004 assessment.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Sonorae1
Outcome
most susceptiblee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Based on the 2004 assessment, Sonora was the most susceptible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1853 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonpareil and Peerless had significantly greater ALS incidence than Butte and Carmel over the two years surveyed.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Material
Nonpareil and Peerlesse2
Outcome
incidence of diseasee2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
Butte and Carmele2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nonpareil and Peerless had significantly greater incidence of disease than Butte and Carmel over the 2 years surveyed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1966–2083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large differences in ALS incidence were found among four almond cultivars in a diseased orchard in Chico, CA.

Taxon
Prunus dulcisPrunus dulcise0
Outcome
ALS incidencee3
Qualifier
large differencese3
Setting
Chico, CAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown 2-year-old almond trees (Prunus dulcis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“Surveys of a diseased orchard in Chico, CA showed large differences in ALS incidence in four almond cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1964 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · Xylella fastidiosa · Prunus dulcis (almond)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.