Paper · 2014 · Plant Disease

First Report of Clubroot on Canola Caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae in North Dakota

K. Chittem; S. M. Mansouripour; L. E. del Río Mendoza

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

North Dakota leads the United States in canola (Brassica napus L.) production (4). A canola field with a distinct patch of dead plants spreading over an area of approximately 0.4 ha was detected in Cavalier County, North Dakota, in early September 2013. Numerous spots within the patch had plant mortalities >80%. Dead plants pulled from the soil had roots with severe galling and clubbing. Clubbed roots were brittle and disintegrated easily when pressed between fingers. Root and soil samples collected at several locations within and outside the affected patch were pooled in separate groups. All plants collected in the patch were symptomatic but those collected outside were not. In the lab, total genomic DNA from three symptomatic and two healthy root samples was extracted using standard procedures and freehand slices were prepared for observation with a compound microscope. Also, DNA from pooled soil samples was extracted using FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH). Round resting structures ranging from 2.2 to 4.2 μm in diameter were observed by microscopic examination of symptomatic root tissues. These structures resembled those typically produced by Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin. This initial identification was later confirmed through PCR analysis using the species specific primers TC1F/R and TC2F/R (1). PCR products of 548 bp (TC1F/R) and 519 bp (TC2F/R) were produced in the three symptomatic and two infested soil samples, confirming the presence of P. brassicae. PCR amplicons were not detected in healthy root and soil samples. Pathogenicity tests were conducted in greenhouse to fulfill Koch's postulates. Briefly, five square plastic pots (10 × 10 × 13 cm) were filled with a 10-cm layer of Sunshine Mix #1 potting mix (Fison Horticulture, Vancouver, BC, Canada) and then 1 g of ground root galls (approximately 5 × 10 5 resting spores) was spread evenly on its surface and covered with 2 cm of soilless mix. A similar number of pots were filled only with soilless mix and used as controls. All pots were planted with two seeds of canola cv. Westar and incubated in greenhouse conditions at 21°C and 16 h light daily. The experiment was conducted twice. Four weeks after planting, all plants in the inoculated pots had developed galls while plants in control pots were symptomless. Presence of P. brassicae resting spores in the newly developed galls was confirmed by microscopic observations and PCR. Based on the symptoms, morphology of resting spores, PCR reactions, and pathogenicity tests, we confirm the presence of P. brassicae on canola. While P. brassicae has been reported as widespread in North America (2), to our knowledge, this is the first report of clubroot on canola in North Dakota and the United States. Clubroot became the most important disease affecting canola production in central Alberta, Canada, within 5 years of its discovery in 2003 (3); since then, the disease has been detected in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (3), Canadian provinces that share borders with North Dakota. Considering the difficulties in management of clubroot, measures should be initiated to limit the spread of the disease before it could pose a threat to United States canola production. References: (1) T. Cao et al. Plant Dis. 91:80, 2007. (2) G. Dixon J. Plant Growth Regul. 28:194, 2009. (3) S. Strelkov and S. Hwang. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 36(S1):27, 2014. (4) USDA-NASS, Ag. Statistics No. 81, 2012.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This is the first report of clubroot on canola in North Dakota and the United States.

Outcome
first report of clubroote1
Setting
North Dakota and the United Statese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“this is the first report of clubroot on canola in North Dakota and the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2685–2769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Numerous spots within the affected canola patch had plant mortalities above 80%.

Outcome
plant mortalitiese1
Value
>80%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Numerous spots within the patch had plant mortalities >80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–312 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead canola plants had roots with severe galling and clubbing.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Outcome
severe galling and clubbinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dead plants pulled from the soil had roots with severe galling and clubbing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–389 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Round resting structures 2.2 to 4.2 um in diameter, resembling those of Plasmodiophora brassicae, were observed in symptomatic root tissues.

Organ / stage
symptomatic root tissuese1
Outcome
Round resting structurese1
Value
2.2 to 4.2 μm in diametere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Round resting structures ranging from 2.2 to 4.2 μm in diameter were observed by microscopic examination of symptomatic root tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species-specific PCR produced products of 548 bp and 519 bp in the three symptomatic root and two infested soil samples, confirming the presence of P. brassicae.

Interactor
P. brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaee1pathogen
Outcome
PCR productse1
Value
548 bp (TC1F/R) and 519 bp (TC2F/R)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmodiophora brassicae
Plasmodiophora brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“PCR products of 548 bp (TC1F/R) and 519 bp (TC2F/R) were produced in the three symptomatic and two infested soil samples, confirming the presence of P. brassicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1506 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR amplicons were not detected in healthy root and soil samples.

Organ / stage
healthy roote1
Outcome
PCR ampliconse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“PCR amplicons were not detected in healthy root and soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse pathogenicity test, all plants in inoculated pots developed galls four weeks after planting, while plants in control pots were symptomless.

Treatment
inoculated potse1
Outcome
developed gallse1
Comparator
control potse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four weeks after planting, all plants in the inoculated pots had developed galls while plants in control pots were symptomless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2202–2328 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. brassicae resting spores were confirmed in the newly developed galls by microscopy and PCR.

Organ / stage
newly developed gallse1
Interactor
P. brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaee1pathogen
Outcome
P. brassicae resting sporese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmodiophora brassicae
Plasmodiophora brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Presence of P. brassicae resting spores in the newly developed galls was confirmed by microscopic observations and PCR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2330–2448 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that measures be initiated to limit the spread of clubroot before it threatens United States canola production.

Outcome
limit the spread of the diseasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“measures should be initiated to limit the spread of the disease before it could pose a threat to United States canola production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3104–3232 · show in text ↑

inoculation · pest · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Inoculation increased rape seed infestation by the fungus.

    GRAY LEAF SPOT OF RAPE IN MANITOBA · 1959 · compared with uninoculated plants

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.