Paper · 2012 · Plant Disease

Soil Solarization and Biological Control for Managing Mesocriconema xenoplax and Short Life in a Newly Established Peach Orchard

A. P. Nyczepir; D. A. Kluepfel; V. Waldrop; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of soil solarization, with and without a Pseudomonas spp. cocktail or wheat rotation as alternatives to chemical control of Mesocriconema xenoplax, were investigated from 2004 to 2011. Preplant solarization and soil fumigation (67% methyl bromide + 33% chloropicrin mixture; henceforth, referred to as MBr) was initiated in 2004 in an orchard infested with M. xenoplax and a history of peach tree short life (PTSL). Plots consisted of nine treatments: (i) nonsolarized soil-alone, (ii) nonsolarized soil with bacteria cocktail (nonsolar-bacteria), (iii) nonsolarized soil with wheat (nonsolar-wheat), (iv) nonsolarized soil with bacteria cocktail and wheat (nonsolar-bacteria-wheat), (v) solarized soil-alone, (vi) solarized soil with bacteria cocktail solar-bacteria), (vii) solarized soil with wheat (solar-wheat), (viii) solarized soil with bacteria cocktail and wheat (solar-bacteria-wheat), and (ix) preplant MBr fumigation. Peach trees were planted into all plots in 2005. Nematode populations were suppressed 20 months longer after orchard establishment in solar-alone and solar-wheat plots than solar-bacteria and solar-bacteria-wheat plots. Pseudomonas spp. cocktails did not have a pronounced effect in suppressing M. xenoplax in this study. Fumigation effect on M. xenoplax population density dissipated 24 months after application. Solar-wheat-treated soil was as effective as preplant MBr fumigation in increasing tree survival from PTSL for at least 6 years after orchard establishment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization alone suppressed nematodes 20 months longer than solarization with bacteria.

Taxon
Peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
solar-alonee0
Interactor
Mesocriconema xenoplaxMesocriconema xenoplaxt0pest
Outcome
Nematode populationse0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
20 monthse0
Comparator
solar-bacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode populations were suppressed 20 months longer after orchard establishment in solar-alone and solar-wheat plots than solar-bacteria and solar-bacteria-wheat plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach trees were planted into all plots in 2005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mesocriconema xenoplax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization with wheat suppressed nematodes 20 months longer than solarization with bacteria and wheat.

Taxon
Peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
solar-wheate0
Interactor
Mesocriconema xenoplaxMesocriconema xenoplaxt0pest
Outcome
Nematode populationse0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
20 monthse0
Comparator
solar-bacteria-wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode populations were suppressed 20 months longer after orchard establishment in solar-alone and solar-wheat plots than solar-bacteria and solar-bacteria-wheat plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach trees were planted into all plots in 2005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mesocriconema xenoplax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas cocktails had no pronounced nematode suppression.

Taxon
Peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
Pseudomonas spp. cocktailse0
Interactor
M. xenoplaxe0pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas spp.Pseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
M. xenoplaxe0
Direction
did not have a pronounced effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas spp. cocktails did not have a pronounced effect in suppressing M. xenoplax in this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach trees were planted into all plots in 2005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation suppression of nematode density dissipated after 24 months.

Taxon
Peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
Fumigatione0
Interactor
M. xenoplaxe0pest
Outcome
M. xenoplax population densitye0
Direction
dissipatede0
Value
24 monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation effect on M. xenoplax population density dissipated 24 months after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1355 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach trees were planted into all plots in 2005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization with wheat matched fumigation for increasing peach survival for at least six years.

Taxon
Peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
Solar-wheat-treated soile0
Outcome
tree survival from PTSLe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
6 yearse0
Comparator
preplant MBr fumigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solar-wheat-treated soil was as effective as preplant MBr fumigation in increasing tree survival from PTSL for at least 6 years after orchard establishment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1512 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach trees were planted into all plots in 2005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–990 · show in text ↑

solarization · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.