Paper · 1989 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDHAVEN PEACH ORCHARD WITH Pratylenchus penetrans-INFESTED AND NONINFESTED ROOTSTOCKS IN A FUMIGATED AND NONFUMIGATED NIAGARA SOIL

Th. H. A. OLTHOF; J. W. POTTER; P. W. JOHNSON

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Redhaven peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees, grafted on the rootstocks Bailey, Siberian C, or Harrow Blood, with roots free of, or infested by, root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus penetrans) were planted in fumigated or P. penetrans-infested Vineland fine sandy loam at Jordan Station, Ontario. Tree growth and soil nematode population densities were monitored for 6 yr. In general, fumigation suppressed soil populations of P. penetrans during the first 4 yr, whereas no consistent nematode control was obtained through the use of nematode-free rootstock. The rootstock Siberian C supported larger numbers of P. penetrans than the other two rootstocks throughout the experiment, whereas Bailey favored the build-up of the pin nematode (Paratylenchus projectus). Tree diameter of nematode-free rootstock was greatest in the first 3 yr only; soil fumigation alone increased growth during the first year only. Tree mortality tended to be lowest in fumigated soil planted to clean rootstocks. Harrow Blood showed the highest mortality; Siberian C the lowest. The data suggest that only nematode-free peach trees should be planted. Orchards should be fumigated if P. penetrans exceeds 800 kg −1 of soil and/or when there is a history of replant failure on a light-textured soil.Key words: Prunus persica, pin nematode, Paratylenchus projectus, replant problem, rootstocks, fumigation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation suppressed soil populations of P. penetrans during the first 4 yr.

Treatment
fumigatione0
Interactor
P. penetransPratylenchus penetranse0pathogen
Outcome
soil populations of P. penetranse0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
4 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetrans · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fumigation suppressed soil populations of P. penetrans during the first 4 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode-free rootstock gave no consistent nematode control.

Treatment
nematode-free rootstocke0
Outcome
nematode controle0
Direction
no consistente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no consistent nematode control was obtained through the use of nematode-free rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siberian C supported larger P. penetrans populations than the other rootstocks.

Material
Siberian Ce0
Interactor
P. penetransPratylenchus penetranse0pathogen
Outcome
numbers of P. penetranse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
other two rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetrans · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rootstock Siberian C supported larger numbers of P. penetrans than the other two rootstocks throughout the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bailey favored pin nematode build-up.

Material
Baileye0
Interactor
Paratylenchus projectusParatylenchus projectuse0pathogen
Outcome
build-up of the pin nematodee0
Direction
build-upe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bailey favored the build-up of the pin nematode (Paratylenchus projectus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode-free rootstock had greatest tree diameter only in the first 3 yr.

Treatment
nematode-free rootstocke0
Outcome
Tree diametere0
Direction
greateste0
Value
3 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tree diameter of nematode-free rootstock was greatest in the first 3 yr only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation increased growth only in the first year.

Treatment
soil fumigatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first year onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil fumigation alone increased growth during the first year only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree mortality tended to be lowest in fumigated soil planted with clean rootstocks.

Treatment
fumigated soil planted to clean rootstockse0
Outcome
Tree mortalitye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tree mortality tended to be lowest in fumigated soil planted to clean rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harrow Blood had the highest mortality.

Material
Harrow Bloode0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harrow Blood showed the highest mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siberian C had the lowest mortality.

Material
Siberian Ce0
Outcome
mortalitye1
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Siberian C the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“Harrow Blood showed the highest mortality; Siberian C the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise planting only nematode-free peach trees.

Outcome
only nematode-free peach trees should be plantede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only nematode-free peach trees should be planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise fumigation where P. penetrans exceeds 800 kg −1 of soil or replant failure has occurred on light-textured soil.

Interactor
P. penetransPratylenchus penetranse0pathogen
Outcome
Orchards should be fumigatede0
Value
800 kg −1 of soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetrans · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orchards should be fumigated if P. penetrans exceeds 800 kg −1 of soil and/or when there is a history of replant failure on a light-textured soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“REDHAVEN PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–33 · show in text ↑

grafting · control · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

grafting · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

grafting · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.