Abstract
Experiments were conducted at Hill Agricultural Research Station, Khagrachari during the period from November to February in 2005-06 and 2006-07 to determine the appropriate irrigation schedule for carrot production in hill valley. The experiment consisted of five treatments of irrigation after plant established viz. No irrigation (I0), irrigation at 1W: CPE of 0.6 (I1), irrigation at 1W: CPE of 0.8 (12), irrigation at 1W: CPE of 1.0 (I3) and irrigation at 1W: CPE of 1.2 (I4). The amount of irrigation water (IW) was fixed at 4 cm. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with 3 replications. The treatments significantly influenced the growth, yield contributing characters and yield of carrot. Among the treatments, irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the maximum yield (51.47 t/ha) which received 4 irrigations after plant stand with applied total irrigation water of 16 cm resulting in the highest net return of Tk. 120,443 with the highest BCR of 2.41. It also produced carrot at the lowest production cost of Tk. 1.66 per kg. Irrigation water use efficiency was obtained 1705.63 kg/ha/cm by this treatment. Keywords: Irrigation; growth; yield; carrot. DOI: 10.3329/bjar.v35i2.5895Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 35(2) : 323-329, June 2010
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation treatments significantly influenced growth, yield contributing characters and yield of carrot
- Taxon
- carrot
Daucus carotat0 - Treatment
- irrigatione2
- Outcome
- growth, yield contributing characters and yielde1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation on the growth and yield of (Daucus carota ssp. sativus) carrot in hill valley”
e1“The treatments significantly influenced the growth, yield contributing characters and yield of carrot”
e2“five treatments of irrigation after plant established”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the maximum carrot yield (51.47 t/ha)
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2e1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 51.47 t/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation on the growth and yield of (Daucus carota ssp. sativus) carrot in hill valley”
e1“irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the maximum yield (51.47 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the highest net return of Tk. 120,443
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2e1
- Outcome
- net returne2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- Tk. 120,443e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation on the growth and yield of (Daucus carota ssp. sativus) carrot in hill valley”
e1“irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the maximum yield (51.47 t/ha)”
e2“resulting in the highest net return of Tk. 120,443”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 2.41
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2e1
- Outcome
- BCRe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 2.41e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation on the growth and yield of (Daucus carota ssp. sativus) carrot in hill valley”
e1“irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the maximum yield (51.47 t/ha)”
e2“with the highest BCR of 2.41”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the lowest carrot production cost of Tk. 1.66 per kg
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2e1
- Outcome
- production coste2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Value
- Tk. 1.66 per kge2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation on the growth and yield of (Daucus carota ssp. sativus) carrot in hill valley”
e1“irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.2 gave the maximum yield (51.47 t/ha)”
e2“It also produced carrot at the lowest production cost of Tk. 1.66 per kg”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency under the best treatment was 1705.63 kg/ha/cm
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Outcome
- Irrigation water use efficiencye1
- Value
- 1705.63 kg/ha/cme1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation on the growth and yield of (Daucus carota ssp. sativus) carrot in hill valley”
e1“Irrigation water use efficiency was obtained 1705.63 kg/ha/cm by this treatment”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.