Paper · 1989 · jpa

Agronomic and Economic Response of Winter Wheat to Foliar Fungicides

S. O. Guy; E. S. Oplinger; D. W. Wiersma; et al.

12
claims
32
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Foliar diseases of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) can reduce grain yield and kernel size. Foliar fungicides can reduce foliar disease losses, but effectiveness depends on rate and timing of application, environment, and cultivar response. These studies were conducted to determine the efficacy and economic feasibility of foliar applied fungicides for winter wheat. Field studies to determine effects of three to seven fungicide treatments on winter wheat grain yield, disease ratings, test weight, kernel weight, plant height, and lodging were conducted in six Wisconsin environments on two cultivars. Fungicides reduced disease ratings as much as 78%, increased kernel weight resulting in a decrease of 500 to 2400 kernels/lb, and increased grain yield from 9.5 to 36.3 bu/acre in environment 1 which had cool, moist weather that was conducive to disease development. Environments 2 to 6 had warmer, dryer conditions and, subsequently, less disease, but fungicides significantly reduced disease in these environments, increased kernel weight, in environments 2 and 5, and increased grain yield in environments 2 and 6. Propiconazole (1‐{[2‐(2,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐4‐propyl‐1,3 dioxolan‐2‐yl]methyl}‐1 H ‐1,2,4‐triazole), trade name Tilt, applied at Zadoks growth stage (GS) 37 (flag leaf emergence) resulted in economic returns from grain yield in five and two of the environments for ‘Caldwell’ and ‘Argee’, respectively. Mancozeb (a coordination product of zinc ion and manganese ethylene bisdithiocarbamate), trade names Dithane M‐45, Manzate 200, Penncozeb, etc.) applied at GS 37 and 50 (head emergence) produced economic returns in four and two of the environments for Caldwell and Argee, respectively. Triadimefon, [1‐(4‐chlorophenoxy)‐3,3‐dimethyl‐1‐(1 H ‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)‐2‐buanone], trade name Bayleton, applied at GS 37 gave economic returns in only three and one of the environments for Caldwell and Argee, respectively, because cost limited its economic benefits. Fungicides may give growers increased economic returns, however that probability is improved when differences in fungicide performance, cultivar disease reaction, and environmental conditions are considered.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides reduced disease ratings up to 78%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fungicidese0
Outcome
disease ratingse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicides reduced disease ratings as much as 78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides increased kernel weight in the first environment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fungicidese2
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
500 to 2400 kernels/lbe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased kernel weight resulting in a decrease of 500 to 2400 kernels/lb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field studies to determine effects of three to seven fungicide treatments on winter wheat grain yield, disease ratings, test weight, kernel weight, plant height, and lodging were conducted in six Wisconsin environments on two cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–608 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicides reduced disease ratings as much as 78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides increased yield to 9.5 to 36.3 bu/acre in environment 1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fungicidese2
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.5 to 36.3 bu/acree0
Setting
environment 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield from 9.5 to 36.3 bu/acre in environment 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field studies to determine effects of three to seven fungicide treatments on winter wheat grain yield, disease ratings, test weight, kernel weight, plant height, and lodging were conducted in six Wisconsin environments on two cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–608 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicides reduced disease ratings as much as 78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides significantly reduced disease in environments 2 to 6.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicides significantly reduced disease in these environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides increased kernel weight in environments 2 and 5.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicidese2
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
environments 2 and 5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased kernel weight, in environments 2 and 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field studies to determine effects of three to seven fungicide treatments on winter wheat grain yield, disease ratings, test weight, kernel weight, plant height, and lodging were conducted in six Wisconsin environments on two cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–608 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicides reduced disease ratings as much as 78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides increased grain yield in environments 2 and 6.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicidese2
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
environments 2 and 6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield in environments 2 and 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field studies to determine effects of three to seven fungicide treatments on winter wheat grain yield, disease ratings, test weight, kernel weight, plant height, and lodging were conducted in six Wisconsin environments on two cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–608 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicides reduced disease ratings as much as 78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–658 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole returned profit in five environments for Caldwell.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Caldwelle0
Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
economic returns from grain yielde0
Value
fivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propiconazole (1‐{[2‐(2,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐4‐propyl‐1,3 dioxolan‐2‐yl]methyl}‐1 H ‐1,2,4‐triazole), trade name Tilt, applied at Zadoks growth stage (GS) 37 (flag leaf emergence) resulted in economic returns from grain yield in five and two of the environments for ‘Caldwell’ and ‘Argee’, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole returned profit in two environments for Argee.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Argeee0
Outcome
economic returns from grain yielde0
Value
twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in economic returns from grain yield in five and two of the environments for ‘Caldwell’ and ‘Argee’, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb returned profit in four environments for Caldwell.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Caldwelle0
Treatment
Mancozebe0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Value
foure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb (a coordination product of zinc ion and manganese ethylene bisdithiocarbamate), trade names Dithane M‐45, Manzate 200, Penncozeb, etc.) applied at GS 37 and 50 (head emergence) produced economic returns in four and two of the environments for Caldwell and Argee, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb returned profit in two environments for Argee.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Argeee0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Value
twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produced economic returns in four and two of the environments for Caldwell and Argee, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triadimefon returned profit in three environments for Caldwell.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Caldwelle0
Treatment
Triadimefone0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Value
threee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triadimefon, [1‐(4‐chlorophenoxy)‐3,3‐dimethyl‐1‐(1 H ‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)‐2‐buanone], trade name Bayleton, applied at GS 37 gave economic returns in only three and one of the environments for Caldwell and Argee, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1939 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triadimefon returned profit in one environment for Argee.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Argeee0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Value
onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gave economic returns in only three and one of the environments for Caldwell and Argee, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1939 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.