Paper · 1996 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Nitrogenase activity, nodulation and seed production inVicia fabaas affected by methabenzthiazuron

J. Martínez; D. Vidal; E. Simón

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The effects of recommended application rates of the herbicide methabenzthiazuron (MBT) (2·5 and 4 kg ha -1 ) on vegetative growth, nodulation and N 2 fixation in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991. Nodulation, specific nitrogenase activity (SNA) of excised nodules, dry weight of plants and seed nitrogen content at harvest were compared in MBT-treated, hand-weeded (HW) and control plants. In 1990 the higher MBT application (4 kg ha -1 ) caused a decrease in nodulation and acetylene reduction activity (ARA) per plant during the mid-period of pod-fill, and also in vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seeds, whereas the lower rate (2·5 kg ha -1 ) did not have a significant effect on any of these factors. However, in 1991, growth and herbicide effects were different from those in the previous year. No inhibitory effect of MBT on nodulation, SNA or ARA per plant was observed and vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seeds were not significantly different from those of plants from HW plots. In 1991, both 4 kg ha -1 of MBT and the HW treatment caused a stimulatory effect on seed N recovery and yield compared to control plants. Rates of ARA per plant at late pod-fill were positively related to N recovery by seeds. These differences could have been due to the low rainfall in 1990, which may have permitted MBT to remain in the soil for a longer period and to inhibit N fixation and plant growth in the Vicia faba crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1990, the higher MBT rate (4 kg/ha) decreased nodulation and acetylene reduction activity per plant at mid pod-fill compared with control plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
mid-period of pod-fille2
Treatment
higher MBT application (4 kg ha -1 )e2
Outcome
nodulation and acetylene reduction activity (ARA) per plante2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
In 1990e2
Comparator
control plantse3
Setting
field at Barcelonae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–246 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1990 the higher MBT application (4 kg ha -1 ) caused a decrease in nodulation and acetylene reduction activity (ARA) per plant during the mid-period of pod-fill, and also in vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seeds, whereas the lower rate (2·5 kg ha -1 ) did not have a significant effect on any of these factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–773 · show in text ↑
e3

“were compared in MBT-treated, hand-weeded (HW) and control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1990, the higher MBT rate (4 kg/ha) decreased vegetative growth, seed production and seed N content compared with control plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
higher MBT application (4 kg ha -1 )e2
Outcome
vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seedse2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
In 1990e2
Comparator
control plantse3
Setting
field at Barcelonae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–246 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1990 the higher MBT application (4 kg ha -1 ) caused a decrease in nodulation and acetylene reduction activity (ARA) per plant during the mid-period of pod-fill, and also in vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seeds, whereas the lower rate (2·5 kg ha -1 ) did not have a significant effect on any of these factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–773 · show in text ↑
e3

“were compared in MBT-treated, hand-weeded (HW) and control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1990, the lower MBT rate (2.5 kg/ha) had no significant effect on any of the measured factors.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
lower rate (2·5 kg ha -1 )e2
Outcome
any of these factorse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier
In 1990e2
Comparator
control plantse3
Setting
field at Barcelonae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–246 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1990 the higher MBT application (4 kg ha -1 ) caused a decrease in nodulation and acetylene reduction activity (ARA) per plant during the mid-period of pod-fill, and also in vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seeds, whereas the lower rate (2·5 kg ha -1 ) did not have a significant effect on any of these factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–773 · show in text ↑
e3

“were compared in MBT-treated, hand-weeded (HW) and control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1991, MBT had no inhibitory effect on nodulation, specific nitrogenase activity or ARA per plant compared with hand-weeded plots.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
MBTe4
Outcome
nodulation, SNA or ARA per plante4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
HW plotse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–246 · show in text ↑
e4

“No inhibitory effect of MBT on nodulation, SNA or ARA per plant was observed and vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seeds were not significantly different from those of plants from HW plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1991, MBT had no significant effect on vegetative growth, seed production or seed N content compared with hand-weeded plots.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
MBTe4
Outcome
vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seedse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
HW plotse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–246 · show in text ↑
e4

“No inhibitory effect of MBT on nodulation, SNA or ARA per plant was observed and vegetative growth, seed production and N content of seeds were not significantly different from those of plants from HW plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1991, the 4 kg/ha MBT rate stimulated seed N recovery and yield compared with control plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
4 kg ha -1 of MBTe5
Outcome
seed N recovery and yielde5
Direction
stimulatorye5
Qualifier
In 1991e5
Comparator
control plantse5
Setting
field at Barcelonae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–246 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1991, both 4 kg ha -1 of MBT and the HW treatment caused a stimulatory effect on seed N recovery and yield compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1991, hand weeding stimulated seed N recovery and yield compared with control plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
the HW treatmente5
Outcome
seed N recovery and yielde5
Direction
stimulatorye5
Qualifier
In 1991e5
Comparator
control plantse5
Setting
field at Barcelonae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–246 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1991, both 4 kg ha -1 of MBT and the HW treatment caused a stimulatory effect on seed N recovery and yield compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1214 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ARA per plant at late pod-fill was positively related to N recovery by seeds.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
late pod-fille6
Outcome
N recovery by seedse6
Direction
positively relatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in faba bean plants were studied in the field at Barcelona during 1990 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–246 · show in text ↑
e6

“Rates of ARA per plant at late pod-fill were positively related to N recovery by seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1302 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lower N fixation and plant growth in the 1990 faba bean crop may have been due to MBT persisting in soil after low rainfall.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae7
Treatment
MBTe7
Outcome
N fixation and plant growthe7
Qualifier
low rainfall in 1990e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“These differences could have been due to the low rainfall in 1990, which may have permitted MBT to remain in the soil for a longer period and to inhibit N fixation and plant growth in the Vicia faba crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1507 · show in text ↑