Paper · 2014 · Chilean journal of agricultural research

Indications that some nutritional elements can improve gladiolus corm and cormel qualities in Mexico

Enrique González-Pérez; Óscar Javier Ayala-Garay; María de Jesús Yáñez-Morales

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In regions of the State of Puebla (Mexico), gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus Andrews) production has had asexual propagation problems, which have caused losses for producers, who mostly produce their own vegetative seeds. The aim of this study was to evaluate some physical qualities and health characteristics of corms and cormels generated at four fertilization rates (FD, kg ha -1 ): 65N-14.9P-171K-16.6Mg-31.2Ca-0.0B-0.0S (FD1); 40.5N-24P-171K-23Mg-37.2Ca-0.2B-8.5S (FD2); 81N-24P-171K-23Mg-37.2Ca-0.2B-0.0S (FD3); and 81N-24P-171K-23Mg-37.2Ca-0.0B-0.0S (FD-R; traditional regional rate). Two hundred and forty corms, along with their cormels, of two varieties ('Borrega Roja' and 'Espuma') produced at four FDs were harvested. The following physical qualities of corms were assessed; corm fresh weight (CFW), number of cormels generated (NcMC), and total fresh weight (TFW); evaluated physical qualities of cormels were size (mm) and total weight. Cormel health was analyzed in 160 randomly disinfested pieces that were plated in agar medium with or without splitting. The percentage of identified fungus incidence was recorded. Data were analyzed by a non-parametric one-way ANOVA. No significant differences were shown for CFW. The best treatments were mainly FD2 followed by FD1. In relation to FD-R, FD2 in both varieties increased NcMC by 31% to 69%, TFW by 27% to 46%, 6-8 size by 24% to 27%, and the development of Fusarium oxysporum colonies was reduced by 100% in cormel internal tissue.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gladiolus corm fresh weight did not differ significantly among the four fertilization rates.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandifloruse4
Treatment
four fertilization ratese0
Outcome
CFWe1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generated at four fertilization rates (FD, kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–386 · show in text ↑
e1

“No significant differences were shown for CFW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1234 · show in text ↑
e4

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus Andrews)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In both varieties FD2 increased cormel number (NcMC) by 31% to 69% relative to FD-R.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandifloruse4
Treatment
FD2e3
Outcome
NcMCe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
31% to 69%e3
Comparator
FD-Re3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In relation to FD-R, FD2 in both varieties increased NcMC by 31% to 69%, TFW by 27% to 46%, 6-8 size by 24% to 27%, and the development of Fusarium oxysporum colonies was reduced by 100% in cormel internal tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1501 · show in text ↑
e4

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus Andrews)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In both varieties FD2 increased corm total fresh weight (TFW) by 27% to 46% relative to FD-R.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandifloruse4
Treatment
FD2e3
Outcome
TFWe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
27% to 46%e3
Comparator
FD-Re3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In relation to FD-R, FD2 in both varieties increased NcMC by 31% to 69%, TFW by 27% to 46%, 6-8 size by 24% to 27%, and the development of Fusarium oxysporum colonies was reduced by 100% in cormel internal tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1501 · show in text ↑
e4

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus Andrews)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In both varieties FD2 increased cormel size (6-8) by 24% to 27% relative to FD-R.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandifloruse4
Treatment
FD2e3
Outcome
6-8 sizee3
Direction
increasede3
Value
24% to 27%e3
Comparator
FD-Re3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In relation to FD-R, FD2 in both varieties increased NcMC by 31% to 69%, TFW by 27% to 46%, 6-8 size by 24% to 27%, and the development of Fusarium oxysporum colonies was reduced by 100% in cormel internal tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1501 · show in text ↑
e4

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus Andrews)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FD2 reduced development of Fusarium oxysporum colonies in cormel internal tissue by 100% relative to FD-R.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandifloruse4
Organ / stage
cormel internal tissuee3
Treatment
FD2e3
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume3pathogen
Outcome
development of Fusarium oxysporum coloniese3
Direction
reducede3
Value
100%e3
Comparator
FD-Re3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In relation to FD-R, FD2 in both varieties increased NcMC by 31% to 69%, TFW by 27% to 46%, 6-8 size by 24% to 27%, and the development of Fusarium oxysporum colonies was reduced by 100% in cormel internal tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1501 · show in text ↑
e4

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus Andrews)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FD2 was mainly the best fertilization treatment, followed by FD1.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandifloruse4
Treatment
FD2e2
Outcome
best treatmentse2
Direction
beste2
Comparator
FD1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The best treatments were mainly FD2 followed by FD1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1287 · show in text ↑
e4

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus Andrews)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–86 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Gladiolus grandiflorusPositive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.