Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Comparison of Conventional and Polymer Coated Urea as Nitrogen Sources for Lowland Rice Production

N. K. Fageria; M. C. S. Carvalho

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is one of the most yield limiting nutrients in lowland rice production. Improving N use efficiency is essential to reduce cost of crop production and environmental pollution. A greenhouse experiment was conducted with the objective to compare conventional and polymer coated urea for lowland rice production. Grain yield, straw yield, panicle density, maximum root length, and root dry weight were significantly increased in a quadratic fashion with the increase of N rate from 0 to 400 mg kg−1 soil. Nitrogen source X N rate interactions for most of these traits were not significant, indicating that lowland rice responded similarly to change in N rates of two N sources. Based on regression equations, maximum grain yield was obtained with the application of 258 mg N kg−1 soil and maximum straw yield was obtained with the addition of 309 mg N kg−1 soil. Nitrogen use efficiency (grain yield per unit of N applied) was maximum for polymer coated urea compared to conventional urea. Root length and root dry weight improved at an adequate N rate, indicating importance of N fertilization in the absorption of water and nutrients and consequently yield. Polymer coated urea had higher soil exchangeable calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), Ca saturation, Mg saturation, base saturation, and effective cation exchange capacity compared to conventional urea. There was a highly significant decrease in soil exchangeable potassium (K) with increasing N rates at harvest of rice plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, straw yield and panicle density increased with N rate from 0 to 400 mg kg−1 soil, in a quadratic fashion.

Taxon
Lowland Ricet0
Treatment
N rate from 0 to 400 mg kg−1 soile0
Outcome
Grain yield, straw yield, panicle densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a quadratic fashione0
Setting
greenhouse experimente1

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield, straw yield, panicle density, maximum root length, and root dry weight were significantly increased in a quadratic fashion with the increase of N rate from 0 to 400 mg kg−1 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–512 · show in text ↑
e1

“A greenhouse experiment was conducted with the objective to compare conventional and polymer coated urea for lowland rice production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum root length and root dry weight increased with N rate from 0 to 400 mg kg−1 soil, in a quadratic fashion.

Taxon
Lowland Ricet0
Treatment
N rate from 0 to 400 mg kg−1 soile0
Outcome
maximum root length, and root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a quadratic fashione0
Setting
greenhouse experimente1

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield, straw yield, panicle density, maximum root length, and root dry weight were significantly increased in a quadratic fashion with the increase of N rate from 0 to 400 mg kg−1 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–512 · show in text ↑
e1

“A greenhouse experiment was conducted with the objective to compare conventional and polymer coated urea for lowland rice production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Based on regression equations, maximum grain yield was obtained at 258 mg N kg−1 soil.

Taxon
Lowland Ricet0
Treatment
application of 258 mg N kg−1 soile2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Qualifier
Based on regression equationse2

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Based on regression equations, maximum grain yield was obtained with the application of 258 mg N kg−1 soil and maximum straw yield was obtained with the addition of 309 mg N kg−1 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Based on regression equations, maximum straw yield was obtained at 309 mg N kg−1 soil.

Taxon
Lowland Ricet0
Treatment
addition of 309 mg N kg−1 soile2
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Qualifier
Based on regression equationse2

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Based on regression equations, maximum grain yield was obtained with the application of 258 mg N kg−1 soil and maximum straw yield was obtained with the addition of 309 mg N kg−1 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency was maximum for polymer coated urea compared with conventional urea.

Taxon
Lowland Ricet0
Treatment
polymer coated ureae3
Outcome
Nitrogen use efficiencye3
Direction
maximume3
Comparator
conventional ureae3

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen use efficiency (grain yield per unit of N applied) was maximum for polymer coated urea compared to conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer coated urea increased soil exchangeable calcium and magnesium compared with conventional urea.

Taxon
Lowland Ricet0
Treatment
Polymer coated ureae4
Outcome
soil exchangeable calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg)e4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
conventional ureae4

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Polymer coated urea had higher soil exchangeable calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), Ca saturation, Mg saturation, base saturation, and effective cation exchange capacity compared to conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer coated urea increased Ca saturation, Mg saturation and base saturation compared with conventional urea.

Taxon
Lowland Ricet0
Treatment
Polymer coated ureae4
Outcome
Ca saturation, Mg saturation, base saturatione4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
conventional ureae4

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Polymer coated urea had higher soil exchangeable calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), Ca saturation, Mg saturation, base saturation, and effective cation exchange capacity compared to conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer coated urea increased effective cation exchange capacity compared with conventional urea.

Taxon
Lowland Ricet0
Treatment
Polymer coated ureae4
Outcome
effective cation exchange capacitye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
conventional ureae4

Verbatim

t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Polymer coated urea had higher soil exchangeable calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), Ca saturation, Mg saturation, base saturation, and effective cation exchange capacity compared to conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1366 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil exchangeable potassium decreased significantly with increasing N rate at harvest of rice plants.

Taxon
rice plantsOryza sativae5
Treatment
increasing N ratese5
Outcome
soil exchangeable potassium (K)e5
Direction
decreasee5
Qualifier
highly significante5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“There was a highly significant decrease in soil exchangeable potassium (K) with increasing N rates at harvest of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1492 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source by N rate interactions were not significant for most traits, so lowland rice responded similarly to the change in N rates of the two sources.

Taxon
lowland ricee6
Treatment
change in N rates of two N sourcese6
Outcome
Nitrogen source X N rate interactionse6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Qualifier
for most of these traitse6

Verbatim

e6

“Nitrogen source X N rate interactions for most of these traits were not significant, indicating that lowland rice responded similarly to change in N rates of two N sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–685 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.