Paper · 1997 · Journal of Experimental Botany

The expression of the tobacco genes encoding plastidic glutamine synthetase or ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase does not depend on the rate of nitrate reduction, and is unaffected by suppression of photorespiration

Andrea Migge; Elisa Carrayol; Caroline Kunz; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The expression of the tobacco genes encoding the ammonium-assimilating enzymes plastidic glutamine synthetase (GS-2) or ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase (Fd-GOGAT) was examined in relation to the rates of two major ammonium-producing processes in leaves, i.e. nitrate reduction and photorespiration. Impairment of nitrate reduction induced by the application of tungstate, a molybdate analogue inhibiting nitrate reductase (NR), resulted in an increase in the NR and the nitrite reductase (NiR) mRNA pools. It is shown that this effect could in part be reversed by the application of ammonium. These results support negative regulation by nitrate-derived N-metabolites of both the NR and NiR mRNA abundance. Both the GS-2 and the Fd-GOGAT transcript level and the corresponding enzymatic activities remained largely unaffected by impairment of nitrate reduction, suggesting that both GS-2 and Fd-GOGAT gene expression are not under the control by end products of nitrogen assimilation. Growth of tobacco at a CO2 partial pressure sufficiently high to suppress photorespiration (300 Pa CO2 had no effect on either the GS-2 or Fd-GOGAT transcript levels. It is concluded that the rate of photorespiratory ammonium production does not exert a metabolic control on GS-2 or Fd-GOGAT gene expression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tungstate impairment of nitrate reduction increased NR mRNA.

Treatment
application of tungstatee0
Gene
NRe0
Outcome
NRe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Impairment of nitrate reduction induced by the application of tungstate, a molybdate analogue inhibiting nitrate reductase (NR), resulted in an increase in the NR and the nitrite reductase (NiR) mRNA pools”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tungstate impairment of nitrate reduction increased NiR mRNA.

Treatment
application of tungstatee0
Gene
NiRe0
Outcome
nitrite reductase (NiR) mRNA poolse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Impairment of nitrate reduction induced by the application of tungstate, a molybdate analogue inhibiting nitrate reductase (NR), resulted in an increase in the NR and the nitrite reductase (NiR) mRNA pools”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium partly reversed the tungstate induced mRNA response.

Treatment
application of ammoniume0
Outcome
this effecte0
Direction
reversede0
Qualifier
in parte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this effect could in part be reversed by the application of ammonium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GS-2 and Fd-GOGAT transcripts and enzyme activities were largely unaffected by impaired nitrate reduction.

Treatment
impairment of nitrate reductione0
Gene
GS-2e0
Outcome
transcript level and the corresponding enzymatic activitiese0
Direction
largely unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the GS-2 and the Fd-GOGAT transcript level and the corresponding enzymatic activities remained largely unaffected by impairment of nitrate reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 suppression of photorespiration did not change GS-2 transcripts.

Treatment
300 Pa CO2e0
Gene
GS-2e0
Outcome
GS-2e0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of tobacco at a CO2 partial pressure sufficiently high to suppress photorespiration (300 Pa CO2 had no effect on either the GS-2 or Fd-GOGAT transcript levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 suppression of photorespiration did not change Fd-GOGAT transcripts.

Treatment
300 Pa CO2e0
Gene
Fd-GOGATe0
Outcome
Fd-GOGAT transcript levelse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of tobacco at a CO2 partial pressure sufficiently high to suppress photorespiration (300 Pa CO2 had no effect on either the GS-2 or Fd-GOGAT transcript levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1158 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

co2 · molecular: expression · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.