Paper · 1999 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Effect of elevated CO2 concentration on acclimation of tobacco plantlets to ex vitro conditions

J. Pospisilova; H. Synkova; D. Haisel; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
55
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1). Stomatal conductances of abaxial and adaxial epidermes measured under optimal conditions were not significantly affected by growth under E, but the stomatal regulation of gas exchange was better. Leaf photosynthetic rate (A) of elevated CO2 plants was similar to that of control plants when both were measured under normal CO2, but higher when both were measured under elevated CO2. The A of elevated CO2 plants was much higher than the A of control plants when measured under their respective growth CO2 concentration, which resulted in their higher growth rate. Chlorophyll a and b contents, and activities of whole electron transport chain and of photosystem (PS) II were not markedly affected by growth under E, and the maximum efficiency of PSII measured as the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence was even slightly increased. Hence no down-regulation of photosynthesis occurred in transplanted plants grown for 4 weeks under E. The contents of β-carotene and of xanthophyll cycle pigments (violaxanthin+antheraxanthin+zeaxanthin) were lower in E plants. The degree of de-epoxidation of xanthophyll cycle pigments was not changed or was even lower after transfer to ex vitro conditions, which indicated that no photoinhibition occurred. Therefore, CO2 enrichment can improve acclimation of in vitro-grown plantlets to ex vitro conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductances of abaxial and adaxial epidermes under optimal conditions were not significantly affected by growth under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancese1
Direction
not significantly affectede1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stomatal conductances of abaxial and adaxial epidermes measured under optimal conditions were not significantly affected by growth under E”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal regulation of gas exchange was better under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
stomatal regulation of gas exchangee1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“the stomatal regulation of gas exchange was better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthetic rate of elevated CO2 plants was similar to control plants when both were measured under normal CO2.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
Leaf photosynthetic rate (A)e1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf photosynthetic rate (A) of elevated CO2 plants was similar to that of control plants when both were measured under normal CO2, but higher when both were measured under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthetic rate of elevated CO2 plants was higher than control plants when both were measured under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
Leaf photosynthetic rate (A)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf photosynthetic rate (A) of elevated CO2 plants was similar to that of control plants when both were measured under normal CO2, but higher when both were measured under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate of elevated CO2 plants was much higher than that of control plants when measured at their respective growth CO2 concentration.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
The Ae1
Direction
much highere1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“The A of elevated CO2 plants was much higher than the A of control plants when measured under their respective growth CO2 concentration, which resulted in their higher growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher photosynthetic rate resulted in a higher growth rate of elevated CO2 plants.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
growth ratee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“The A of elevated CO2 plants was much higher than the A of control plants when measured under their respective growth CO2 concentration, which resulted in their higher growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a and b contents and activities of the whole electron transport chain and of photosystem II were not markedly affected by growth under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
Chlorophyll a and b contents, and activities of whole electron transport chain and of photosystem (PS) IIe1
Direction
not markedly affectede1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll a and b contents, and activities of whole electron transport chain and of photosystem (PS) II were not markedly affected by growth under E”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) was even slightly increased under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
maximum efficiency of PSIIe1
Direction
slightly increasede1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum efficiency of PSII measured as the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence was even slightly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No down-regulation of photosynthesis occurred in transplanted plants grown for 4 weeks under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
down-regulation of photosynthesise1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“no down-regulation of photosynthesis occurred in transplanted plants grown for 4 weeks under E”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contents of beta-carotene and xanthophyll cycle pigments were lower in elevated CO2 plants.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
contents of β-carotene and of xanthophyll cycle pigmentse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“The contents of β-carotene and of xanthophyll cycle pigments (violaxanthin+antheraxanthin+zeaxanthin) were lower in E plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The degree of de-epoxidation of xanthophyll cycle pigments was not changed or was even lower after transfer to ex vitro conditions.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
degree of de-epoxidation of xanthophyll cycle pigmentse1
Direction
not changed or was even lowere1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“The degree of de-epoxidation of xanthophyll cycle pigments was not changed or was even lower after transfer to ex vitro conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No photoinhibition occurred in the elevated CO2 plants.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
photoinhibitione1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“no photoinhibition occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1467 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that CO2 enrichment can improve acclimation of in vitro-grown plantlets to ex vitro conditions.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Outcome
acclimatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“CO2 enrichment can improve acclimation of in vitro-grown plantlets to ex vitro conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1569 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

co2 · physiology: pigments · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

co2 · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.