Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The degree of de-epoxidation of xanthophyll cycle pigments was not changed or was even lower after transfer to ex vitro conditions.

A claim from Effect of elevated CO2 concentration on acclimation of tobacco plantlets to ex vitro conditions · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The degree of de-epoxidation of xanthophyll cycle pigments was not changed or was even lower after transfer to ex vitro conditions.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)e0
Outcome
degree of de-epoxidation of xanthophyll cycle pigmentse1
Direction
not changed or was even lowere1
Comparator
normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. plants grown in vitro were transferred to ex vitro conditions and grown for 28 d in a greenhouse under normal CO2 concentration (C, 330 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (E, 1000 µmol mol−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219
e1

“The degree of de-epoxidation of xanthophyll cycle pigments was not changed or was even lower after transfer to ex vitro conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1417

Title

Effect of elevated CO2 concentration on acclimation of tobacco plantlets to ex vitro conditions

J. Pospisilova; H. Synkova; D. Haisel; et al. Journal of Experimental Botany 1999. doi:10.1093/jxb/50.330.119

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e9668d7c3d52f480cfffebf9c992c3f12b49482a28c77c9730181d8ba333612c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

co2 · physiology: pigments · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.