Paper · 1965 · Agronomy Journal

Influence of Topping and Side Pruning on Cotton Yield and Other Characteristics1

O. L. Bennett; D. A. Ashley; B. D. Doss; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Synopsis Yields were increased and plant lodging was almost eliminated by topping or by using a combination of topping and pruning of side branches of cotton plants. Boll rot was reduced by altering plant geometry. The lint percentage, fiber length, and micronaire were increased by topping plants at 48 inches.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping increased cotton yield.

Treatment
toppinge0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were increased and plant lodging was almost eliminated by topping or by using a combination of topping and pruning of side branches of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined topping and side branch pruning increased cotton yield.

Treatment
combination of topping and pruning of side branchese0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were increased and plant lodging was almost eliminated by topping or by using a combination of topping and pruning of side branches of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping almost eliminated cotton lodging.

Treatment
toppinge0
Outcome
plant lodginge0
Direction
almost eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were increased and plant lodging was almost eliminated by topping or by using a combination of topping and pruning of side branches of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined topping and side branch pruning almost eliminated cotton lodging.

Treatment
combination of topping and pruning of side branchese0
Outcome
plant lodginge0
Direction
almost eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were increased and plant lodging was almost eliminated by topping or by using a combination of topping and pruning of side branches of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Altering cotton plant geometry reduced boll rot.

Treatment
altering plant geometrye0
Outcome
Boll rote0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boll rot was reduced by altering plant geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping cotton at 48 inches increased lint percentage, fiber length, and micronaire.

Treatment
topping plants at 48 inchese0
Outcome
lint percentage, fiber length, and micronairee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lint percentage, fiber length, and micronaire were increased by topping plants at 48 inches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 49 positive, 27 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

pruning · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

pruning · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 15 positive, 16 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.