Paper · 2005 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF SOWING AND THINNING DATES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF COTTON

E. El-Sayed,

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate during 2002 and 2003 seasons to study the response of Giza 88 cotton cultivar to two sowing dates at early sowing (25th March) and late sowing (5th May) and thinning dates were at three physiological ages; i.e. when cotton plants formed the first true leaf, the second true leaf and the third true leaf. A split plot design was used with four replications. The obtained results revealed that early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position. On the other hand, earliness measurements, such as position of first sympodium, days to first flower appearance and cracking boll and earliness percentage were significantly increased when cotton plants were sown early in the season. Also, the early sowing date (25th March) produced the highest value of open bolls, boll weight, seed cotton yield /plant and feddan, while number of unopen bolls/plant, seed index and lint percentage were not significantly affected by sowing date. On the other hand, thinning date significantly affected the growth traits, earliness parameters, yield and its components in the two seasons except number of unopen bolls/plant, seed index and lint percentage. Thinning conducted when cotton plants formed the second true leaf gave the best result in the two seasons. Delaying thinning date significantly increased plant height, the internode length, position of first sympodium, days from sowing to appearance of the first flower and cracking the first boll while, the reverse trend was true for number of internodes on the main stem, number of monopodia and sympodia/plant, earliness percentage, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, lint % and seed cotton yield/plant and feddan. The interaction had insignificant effect on all traits studied except number of unopen bolls per plant, seed index and lint percentage. Generally, best results were obtained when cotton plants were sown early (25th March) and thinned after formation of the second true leaf.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed number of internodes.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
number of internodese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed sympodia on the main stem.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
sympodia on the main steme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed number of open bolls per plant.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
number of open bolls per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed boll weight.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed number of days to the first flower appearance.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
number of days to the first flower appearancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed days to the first cracking boll.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
days to the first cracking bolle0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed earliness percentage.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
earliness percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yield, per plant and feddane0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed plant height.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reverse trende0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed internode length.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
internode lengthe0
Direction
reverse trende0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed number of monopodial branches.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
number of monopodial branchese0
Direction
reverse trende0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing changed first sympodium position.

Treatment
early sowing (25 March)e0
Outcome
first sympodium positione0
Direction
reverse trende0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (25 March) significantly increased number of internodes and sympodia on the main stem, number of open bolls per plant, boll weight, number of days to the first flower appearance, days to the first cracking boll, earliness percentage and seed cotton yield, per plant and feddan while the reverse trend was noticed with plant height, internode length number of monopodial branches and first sympodium position.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date did not significantly affect number of unopen bolls/plant.

Treatment
sowing datee0
Outcome
number of unopen bolls/plante0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of unopen bolls/plant, seed index and lint percentage were not significantly affected by sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date did not significantly affect seed index.

Treatment
sowing datee0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of unopen bolls/plant, seed index and lint percentage were not significantly affected by sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date did not significantly affect lint percentage.

Treatment
sowing datee0
Outcome
lint percentagee0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of unopen bolls/plant, seed index and lint percentage were not significantly affected by sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying thinning increased plant height.

Treatment
Delaying thinning datee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying thinning date significantly increased plant height, the internode length, position of first sympodium, days from sowing to appearance of the first flower and cracking the first boll while, the reverse trend was true for number of internodes on the main stem, number of monopodia and sympodia/plant, earliness percentage, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, lint % and seed cotton yield/plant and feddan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–2134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying thinning increased internode length.

Treatment
Delaying thinning datee0
Outcome
internode lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying thinning date significantly increased plant height, the internode length, position of first sympodium, days from sowing to appearance of the first flower and cracking the first boll while, the reverse trend was true for number of internodes on the main stem, number of monopodia and sympodia/plant, earliness percentage, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, lint % and seed cotton yield/plant and feddan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–2134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying thinning increased position of first sympodium.

Treatment
Delaying thinning datee0
Outcome
position of first sympodiume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying thinning date significantly increased plant height, the internode length, position of first sympodium, days from sowing to appearance of the first flower and cracking the first boll while, the reverse trend was true for number of internodes on the main stem, number of monopodia and sympodia/plant, earliness percentage, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, lint % and seed cotton yield/plant and feddan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–2134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying thinning increased days from sowing to appearance of the first flower.

Treatment
Delaying thinning datee0
Outcome
days from sowing to appearance of the first flowere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying thinning date significantly increased plant height, the internode length, position of first sympodium, days from sowing to appearance of the first flower and cracking the first boll while, the reverse trend was true for number of internodes on the main stem, number of monopodia and sympodia/plant, earliness percentage, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, lint % and seed cotton yield/plant and feddan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–2134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying thinning increased cracking the first boll.

Treatment
Delaying thinning datee0
Outcome
cracking the first bolle0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying thinning date significantly increased plant height, the internode length, position of first sympodium, days from sowing to appearance of the first flower and cracking the first boll while, the reverse trend was true for number of internodes on the main stem, number of monopodia and sympodia/plant, earliness percentage, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, lint % and seed cotton yield/plant and feddan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–2134 · show in text ↑

sowing time · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pruning · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

sowing time · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 18 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sowing time · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 23 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

sowing time · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 66 positive, 29 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.