Paper · 2024 · Industrial Crops and Products

Genome-wide identification of isopentenyl transferase genes in cotton and their roles in regulating vegetative branching after topping

Lin Sun; Yanjun Zhang; Wenting Hou; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
10
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The promotion of vegetative branching in plants after topping has been observed without a clear understanding of the underlying mechanism. This study aimed to investigate the role of isopentenyl transferase ( IPT ) and cytokinins in the regulation of vegetative branching in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), hypothesizing that they play key roles in this process. Plant topping was implemented at peak flowering stage in field-grown cotton, and seedcotton yield, yield components, vegetative branching, fruiting, and cytokinin levels were examined over two consecutive years. The results showed that plant topping significantly enhanced the growth and development of vegetative branches, as evidenced by increased biomass, leaf area, and fruiting of vegetative branches, along with an accumulation of cytokinin accumulation at the tips of vegetative branches. This led to a 10.3 % rise in boll density and an 11.4 % increase in seedcotton yield compared with the non-topped control. The analysis of RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data revealed significant differences in the expression patterns of IPT genes, suggesting their importance in regulating the growth and development of vegetative branches. Furthermore, examing the IPT gene families in diploid and tetraploid cotton species identified a total of 8, 8, 16, and 16 IPT genes, categorized into 6 groups. Prediction of cis-acting elements of GhIPT gene family promoters and analysis of their expression profiles demonstrated the involvement of GhIPT genes in multiple plant growth pathways with specific spatio-temporal expression. The findings underline that plant topping enhances cytokinins accumulation at vegetative branch tips by up-regulating IPT genes, leading to increased vegetative branching, fruiting, and ultimately, seedcotton yield. This study provides valuable insights into enhancing cotton yield formation through the regulation of growth and development of vegetative branches by GhIPTs and offers a crucial reference for further investigations into the functions of IPT genes. • Plant topping at peak flowering boost vegetative branch growth in cotton. • Topping increases expression of isopentenyl transferase genes in branches. • Topping enhances cytokinin accumulation through gene expression. • Raised cytokinin accumulation led to enhanced vegetative branching. • Topping enhances seedcotton yield through enhanced vegetative branching.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping increased vegetative branch biomass, leaf area and fruiting.

Treatment
plant toppinge0
Outcome
biomass, leaf area, and fruiting of vegetative branchese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant topping significantly enhanced the growth and development of vegetative branches, as evidenced by increased biomass, leaf area, and fruiting of vegetative branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping increased cytokinin accumulation at vegetative branch tips.

Organ / stage
tips of vegetative branchese0
Treatment
toppingt0
Outcome
cytokinin accumulatione0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“along with an accumulation of cytokinin accumulation at the tips of vegetative branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genome-wide identification of isopentenyl transferase genes in cotton and their roles in regulating vegetative branching after topping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping increased cotton boll density by 10.3% versus non-topped control.

Treatment
toppingt0
Outcome
boll densitye0
Direction
risee0
Value
10.3 %e0
Comparator
non-topped controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This led to a 10.3 % rise in boll density and an 11.4 % increase in seedcotton yield compared with the non-topped control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“topping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping increased seedcotton yield by 11.4% versus non-topped control.

Treatment
toppingt0
Outcome
seedcotton yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.4 %e0
Comparator
non-topped controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This led to a 10.3 % rise in boll density and an 11.4 % increase in seedcotton yield compared with the non-topped control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“topping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IPT genes showed significantly different expression patterns.

Gene
IPT genese0
Outcome
expression patterns of IPT genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences in the expression patterns of IPT genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diploid and tetraploid cotton species had 8, 8, 16 and 16 IPT genes across six groups.

Gene
IPT genese0
Outcome
IPT genese0
Value
8, 8, 16, and 16e0
Qualifier
6 groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diploid and tetraploid cotton species identified a total of 8, 8, 16, and 16 IPT genes, categorized into 6 groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1350 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhIPT expression profiles and promoter elements implicated the genes in multiple growth pathways.

Gene
GhIPT genese0
Outcome
multiple plant growth pathwayse0
Qualifier
specific spatio-temporal expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prediction of cis-acting elements of GhIPT gene family promoters and analysis of their expression profiles demonstrated the involvement of GhIPT genes in multiple plant growth pathways with specific spatio-temporal expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 49 positive, 27 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

pruning · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.