Paper · 2004 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Nitrogen Fertilization on Rye Pasture: Effect on Forage Chemical Composition, Voluntary Intake, Digestibility and Rumen Degradation

C. M. Ferri; N. P. Stritzler; J. H. Pagella

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization of a rye pasture ( Secale cereale L.) on the chemical composition of forage and its utilization in vivo and in situ were investigated in winter (W) and early spring (S). Half of the paddock to be assayed was spread with 93 kg urea–N ha −1 (treatment F), and the other half was not fertilized (treatment NF). Each experiment lasted for 17 days; apparent dry matter digestibility in vivo , voluntary dry matter intake (DMI) and digestible DMI were measured on nine rams per treatment. Two rumen cannulated animals per treatment were under the same feeding regime, and used to collect samples of rumen contents. The concentrations of ammonia (NH 3 ) and short‐chain fatty acids and pH were measured in these samples. The offered forage was also incubated in the rumen of three Holstein–Friesian steers to estimate its degradation parameters in situ . Fertilization with N increased total N and decreased dry matter (DM) and non‐structural carbohydrate concentrations in both periods. DMI was reduced by fertilization. The rumen concentrations of NH 3 were higher in F than in NF in both periods. In both periods, the effective DM degradability of forage was higher in F than in NF. N fertilization affects chemical composition, voluntary intake and rumen digestion of forage from rye pasture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased total nitrogen in rye forage in winter and spring.

Treatment
Fertilization with Ne0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both periodse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with N increased total N and decreased dry matter (DM) and non‐structural carbohydrate concentrations in both periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization lowered dry matter concentration.

Treatment
Fertilization with Ne0
Outcome
dry matter (DM)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both periodse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with N increased total N and decreased dry matter (DM) and non‐structural carbohydrate concentrations in both periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization lowered nonstructural carbohydrate concentration.

Treatment
Fertilization with Ne0
Outcome
non‐structural carbohydrate concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both periodse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with N increased total N and decreased dry matter (DM) and non‐structural carbohydrate concentrations in both periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization reduced dry matter intake by rams.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
DMIe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rye Pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“DMI was reduced by fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rumen ammonia concentrations were higher with fertilization in both periods.

Treatment
Fe0
Outcome
rumen concentrations of NH 3e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
both periodse0
Comparator
NFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rye Pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The rumen concentrations of NH 3 were higher in F than in NF in both periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective forage dry matter degradability was higher with fertilizer in both periods.

Treatment
Fe0
Outcome
effective DM degradability of foragee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
both periodse0
Comparator
NFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rye Pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both periods, the effective DM degradability of forage was higher in F than in NF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1228 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.