Paper · 1996 · Environmental Entomology

Antiherbivore Defense Mutualism Under Elevated Carbon Dioxide Levels: A Fungal Endophyte and Grass

Susan Marks; David E. Lincoln

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
47
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that insects commonly consume more when fed leaf tissue grown under CO2 enrichment, but with few negative effects on growth. However, lepidopteran larvae fed tissue infected with Balansiae fungal endophytes (which produce toxic alkaloids) typically eat less but also suffer negative effects on growth and survival. This study was carried out to understand how these 2 factors may interact to affect larval consumption and growth in fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Infected and uninfected ramets of a single genotype of tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb., were grown under CO2 concentrations of 400 and 700 μl CO2/liter of air. Relative consumption of leaf tissue by larvae was 32% greater in the high CO2 treatment compared with leaves grown under low CO2 concentrations, but was not influenced by infection. As expected, larvae had significantly decreased relative growth rates when fed infected tissue, with their growth rates somewhat increased under high CO2 levels. Increased CO2 level and infection both led to significantly reduced efficiency of conversion of ingested food. These 2 factors also interacted so that the lowest efficiency of conversion of ingested food was seen when both infection and an enriched atmospheric CO2 environment were present. As global atmospheric CO2 levels continue to increase, it appears that fungal endophytes will continue to be important in turfgrasses as protection against insect herbivores and may lead to increased fitness for infected plant genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm larvae consumed 32% more fescue leaf tissue grown at high CO2 than low CO2.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
high CO2 treatmente1
Interactor
larvaee1herbivore
Outcome
consumption of leaf tissue by larvaee1
Direction
greatere1
Value
32%e1
Comparator
low CO2 concentrationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative consumption of leaf tissue by larvae was 32% greater in the high CO2 treatment compared with leaves grown under low CO2 concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal infection did not influence relative larval consumption.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
infectione1
Interactor
larvaee2herbivore
Outcome
Relative consumption of leaf tissue by larvaee2
Direction
not influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“but was not influenced by infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–887 · show in text ↑
e2

“Relative consumption of leaf tissue by larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Larvae fed infected fescue tissue had significantly lower relative growth rates.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
infected tissuee1
Interactor
larvaee1herbivore
Outcome
relative growth ratese1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“larvae had significantly decreased relative growth rates when fed infected tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval growth rates were somewhat higher with elevated CO2.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
high CO2 levelse1
Interactor
larvaee2herbivore
Outcome
growth ratese1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“their growth rates somewhat increased under high CO2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1049 · show in text ↑
e2

“larvae had significantly decreased relative growth rates when fed infected tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly reduced the larval efficiency of converting ingested food.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
Increased CO2 levele1
Outcome
efficiency of conversion of ingested foode1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increased CO2 level and infection both led to significantly reduced efficiency of conversion of ingested food.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte infection significantly reduced the larval efficiency of converting ingested food.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
infectione1
Outcome
efficiency of conversion of ingested foode1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increased CO2 level and infection both led to significantly reduced efficiency of conversion of ingested food.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined infection and CO2 enrichment produced the lowest larval food conversion efficiency.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
both infection and an enriched atmospheric CO2 environmente1
Outcome
lowest efficiency of conversion of ingested foode1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest efficiency of conversion of ingested food was seen when both infection and an enriched atmospheric CO2 environment were present.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1341 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors anticipate endophytes will remain important for turfgrass protection from insect herbivores as CO2 rises.

Taxon
turfgrassese0
Outcome
protection against insect herbivorese0

Verbatim

e0

“fungal endophytes will continue to be important in turfgrasses as protection against insect herbivores and may lead to increased fitness for infected plant genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1579 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

infection · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

infection · pest · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.