Paper · 2007 · NZGA Research and Practice Series

Advantages of endophyte infection for irrigated pastures of semiarid cold-desert environments

B.L. Waldron

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Little research has evaluated possible endophyte benefits to adaptation and production of grasses in the irrigated pastures of the semiarid, cold-desert environments of the western USA. Severe irrigation shortages are common; however, production demands are increasing, necessitating maximizing tall fescue's (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) productivity when grown in sub-optimal conditions including drought, salinity, and cold temperatures. In a field study under irrigation in the Intermountain Western USA, the yield advantage to Kentucky 31 tall fescue infected with wild-type Neotyphodium over endophyte-free Kentucky 31 was greatest (over 15%) when irrigation was severely limited to natural precipitation. In an evaluation of salinity tolerance there were no significant differences in plant LD50 values due to endophyte infection. In a recent study Jesup MaxQ recovered better from winter injury than Jesup E- when grown in a high-elevation colddesert, irrigated environment. These studies suggest the need for additional research to elucidate the potential advantages of wildtype and novel endophytes for tall fescue production in irrigated environments typical of the semiarid western USA. Keywords: tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb., Neotyphodium, drought tolerance, salinity tolerance, winterhardiness

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild-type Neotyphodium infection gave Kentucky 31 tall fescue a yield advantage over endophyte-free plants exceeding 15% under severe irrigation limitation.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Material
Kentucky 31e0
Treatment
infected with wild-type Neotyphodiume0
Interactor
NeotyphodiumNeotyphodiume0symbiont
Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
greateste0
Value
over 15%e0
Qualifier
when irrigation was severely limited to natural precipitatione0
Comparator
endophyte-free Kentucky 31e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neotyphodium
Neotyphodium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Nick Hill · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield advantage to Kentucky 31 tall fescue infected with wild-type Neotyphodium over endophyte-free Kentucky 31 was greatest (over 15%) when irrigation was severely limited to natural precipitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte infection did not significantly change tall fescue salinity LD50.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
endophyte infectione0
Outcome
plant LD50 valuese0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in plant LD50 values due to endophyte infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue's (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jesup MaxQ recovered better from winter injury than Jesup E- in a high-elevation irrigated setting.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Material
Jesup MaxQe0
Treatment
Jesup MaxQe0
Outcome
recovered better from winter injurye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Jesup E-e0
Setting
high-elevation colddesert, irrigated environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Jesup MaxQ recovered better from winter injury than Jesup E- when grown in a high-elevation colddesert, irrigated environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue's (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–351 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for further research on endophyte advantages for tall fescue in western irrigated environments.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
need for additional research to elucidate the potential advantages of wildtype and novel endophytese0
Setting
semiarid western USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These studies suggest the need for additional research to elucidate the potential advantages of wildtype and novel endophytes for tall fescue production in irrigated environments typical of the semiarid western USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1197 · show in text ↑

infection · pest · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · pest · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.