Abstract
Irrigated tall fescue (Fesluca arundinacea: Schreb) was evaluated over four seasons, in the spring and autumn, and was able to maintain a milk productionof 15.5kg FCM/d for medium-sized(550kg) Friesiancows in mid-lactation, under a lax grazing programme. The response to concentrate feeding was 0.88 kg FCM/kg concentrate fed (as fed basis). The in vivo DOM of the pasture remained relatively high (within the range 61-63) during autumn even as the season progressed,whereas the DOM of the spring fescuedeclinedmarkedly (from62 to 57) as the grass set seed. However, this decline in the DOM value was not reflected in the milk production of the cows grazing the pasture, which indicates selectivegrazing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Tall fescue pasture supported milk production of 15.5kg FCM/d in grazing cows.
- Taxon
- tall fescue
Lolium arundinaceume0 - Outcome
- milk productionofe0
- Value
- 15.5kg FCM/de0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigated tall fescue (Fesluca arundinacea: Schreb) was evaluated over four seasons, in the spring and autumn, and was able to maintain a milk productionof 15.5kg FCM/d”
Claim · model-written summary
Concentrate feeding produced 0.88 kg FCM per kg concentrate.
- Taxon
- tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
- Treatment
- concentrate feedinge0
- Outcome
- response to concentrate feedinge0
- Value
- 0.88 kg FCM/kg concentrate fede0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The response to concentrate feeding was 0.88 kg FCM/kg concentrate fed”
t0“tall fescue”
Claim · model-written summary
Pasture DOM stayed within 61-63 in autumn.
- Taxon
- tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
- Outcome
- in vivo DOM of the pasturee0
- Direction
- remained relatively highe0
- Value
- 61-63e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The in vivo DOM of the pasture remained relatively high (within the range 61-63) during autumn”
t0“tall fescue”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring fescue DOM fell from 62 to 57 as grass set seed.
- Taxon
- tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
- Outcome
- DOM of the spring fescuee0
- Direction
- declinedmarkedlye0
- Value
- from62 to 57e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the DOM of the spring fescuedeclinedmarkedly (from62 to 57) as the grass set seed”
t0“tall fescue”
Claim · model-written summary
The spring DOM decline did not reduce milk production, suggesting selective grazing.
- Taxon
- tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
- Organ / stage
- pasturee0
- Outcome
- milk production of the cowse0
- Direction
- not reflectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this decline in the DOM value was not reflected in the milk production of the cows grazing the pasture, which indicates selectivegrazing”
t0“tall fescue”
The same questions in other papers
infection · pest · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.