Paper · 2014 · Agronomy Journal

Kura Clover Living Mulch for Furrow‐Irrigated Corn in the Intermountain West

Calvin H. Pearson; Joe E. Brummer; Andrew T. Beahm; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Kura clover ( Trifolium ambiguum M. Bieb.) living mulches have been used successfully to produce corn ( Zea mays L.) in the upper Midwest. A study was conducted at Fruita, CO (39.1500° N, 108.7167° W), to evaluate corn production in a kura clover living mulch system under furrow irrigation. Living mulch treatments were: (i) no‐till, (ii) no‐till with a pre‐plant herbicide application, and (iii) strip‐tillage. Nitrogen fertilization rates of 0, 84, and 168 kg N ha −1 were applied to living mulch plots and 0, 168, and 336 kg N ha −1 were applied to conventional corn plots. Grain yield was responsive to N rate with highest yields in kura clover living mulch plots occurring at 168 kg N ha −1 (10.1 and 10.8 Mg ha −1 in 2007 and 2008, respectively). The strip‐till treatment performed best in 2007, yielding 11.7 Mg ha −1 at 168 kg N ha −1 , but did not differ from the no‐till with pre‐plant herbicide in 2008. Averaged across tillage treatments, kura clover biomass was highest (991 kg ha −1 ) when no N was applied and the difference in kura clover biomass was not significant between the 84 and 168 kg ha −1 N rates. There was no difference in kura clover production among suppression treatments (averaging 726 kg ha −1 ). Strip‐tillage at a 168 kg N ha −1 rate is a promising option for producing grain corn in a kura clover living mulch cropping system under furrow irrigation in the Intermountain West.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield in living mulch responded to nitrogen, peaking at 168 kg N ha −1 in both years.

Treatment
168 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.1 and 10.8 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
N ratee0
Setting
kura clover living mulch plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was responsive to N rate with highest yields in kura clover living mulch plots occurring at 168 kg N ha −1 (10.1 and 10.8 Mg ha −1 in 2007 and 2008, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip tillage yielded 11.7 Mg ha −1 at 168 kg N ha −1 in 2007 and performed best.

Treatment
strip‐till treatmente0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Direction
beste0
Value
11.7 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strip‐till treatment performed best in 2007, yielding 11.7 Mg ha −1 at 168 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip tillage did not differ from no till with preplant herbicide in 2008.

Treatment
strip‐till treatmente0
Outcome
did not differe0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
no‐till with pre‐plant herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strip‐till treatment performed best in 2007, yielding 11.7 Mg ha −1 at 168 kg N ha −1 , but did not differ from the no‐till with pre‐plant herbicide in 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kura clover biomass was highest without applied nitrogen, at 991 kg ha −1.

Taxon
kura clovere0
Treatment
no N was appliede0
Outcome
kura clover biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
991 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“kura clover biomass was highest (991 kg ha −1 ) when no N was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Kura clover biomass did not significantly differ between the 84 and 168 kg ha −1 nitrogen rates.

Taxon
kura clovere0
Treatment
84e0
Outcome
kura clover biomasse0
Direction
not significante0
Comparator
168 kg ha −1 N ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“the difference in kura clover biomass was not significant between the 84 and 168 kg ha −1 N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kura clover production did not differ among suppression treatments, averaging 726 kg ha −1.

Taxon
kura clovere0
Treatment
suppression treatmentse0
Outcome
kura clover productione0
Direction
no differencee0
Value
726 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in kura clover production among suppression treatments (averaging 726 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1229 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend strip tillage at 168 kg N ha −1 for furrow irrigated grain corn in living mulch.

Outcome
Strip‐tillage at a 168 kg N ha −1 ratee0
Setting
Intermountain Weste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strip‐tillage at a 168 kg N ha −1 rate is a promising option for producing grain corn in a kura clover living mulch cropping system under furrow irrigation in the Intermountain West”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1412 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.