Paper · 2001 · Agronomy Journal

Row Spacing, Plant Density, and Nitrogen Effects on Corn Silage

William J. Cox; Debbie J. R. Cherney

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
160
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Dairy producers in the northeastern USA who grow corn ( Zea mays L.) forage in narrow rows plant at 125000 plants ha −1 and fertilize at 225 kg N ha −1 because they believe narrow‐row corn yields best at high plant densities and N rates. We evaluated corn in 1996 and 1997 at two row spacings (0.38 and 0.76 m), two harvest densities (80000 and 116000 plants ha −1 ), and six N rates (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg ha −1 ) to determine if row spacing × plant density × N rate interactions existed for dry matter (DM) and calculated milk yields. No interactions existed for DM yield, forage quality characteristics, and milk yields. Corn had greater DM and milk yields at 0.38‐ (20.3 and 16.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively) vs. 0.76‐m spacing (18.9 and 15.2 Mg ha −1 , respectively). Dry matter and milk yields had quadratic‐plus‐plateau responses to N rates with maximum yields (20.6 and 17.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively) at an N rate of 150 kg ha −1 . Nitrogen accumulation at harvest, which had a row spacing × N rate interaction, had a linear response to N rates at 0.38‐m spacing and a quadratic response at 0.76‐m spacing. Dairy farmers in the northeastern USA can produce corn silage at similar plant densities and N fertility, regardless of row spacing. Dairy producers who have excess animal waste could apply slightly more N to narrow‐row corn silage because it accumulates more N at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No row spacing x plant density x N rate interactions existed for dry matter yield, forage quality characteristics or calculated milk yields in corn.

Outcome
interactions existed for DM yield, forage quality characteristics, and milk yieldse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“No interactions existed for DM yield, forage quality characteristics, and milk yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn had greater dry matter yield at 0.38 m row spacing (20.3 Mg ha-1) than at 0.76 m spacing (18.9 Mg ha-1).

Treatment
0.38‐e1
Outcome
DMe1
Direction
greatere1
Value
20.3e1
Qualifier
18.9 and 15.2 Mg ha −1e1
Comparator
0.76‐m spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn had greater DM and milk yields at 0.38‐ (20.3 and 16.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively) vs. 0.76‐m spacing (18.9 and 15.2 Mg ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn had greater calculated milk yield at 0.38 m row spacing (16.1 Mg ha-1) than at 0.76 m spacing (15.2 Mg ha-1).

Treatment
0.38‐e1
Outcome
milk yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
16.1 Mg ha −1e1
Qualifier
15.2 Mg ha −1e1
Comparator
0.76‐m spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn had greater DM and milk yields at 0.38‐ (20.3 and 16.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively) vs. 0.76‐m spacing (18.9 and 15.2 Mg ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn dry matter yield had a quadratic-plus-plateau response to N rate, with a maximum of 20.6 Mg ha-1 at 150 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
N rate of 150 kg ha −1e2
Outcome
Dry mattere2
Direction
maximume2
Value
20.6e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dry matter and milk yields had quadratic‐plus‐plateau responses to N rates with maximum yields (20.6 and 17.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively) at an N rate of 150 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn calculated milk yield had a quadratic-plus-plateau response to N rate, with a maximum of 17.1 Mg ha-1 at 150 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
N rate of 150 kg ha −1e2
Outcome
milk yieldse2
Direction
maximume2
Value
17.1 Mg ha −1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dry matter and milk yields had quadratic‐plus‐plateau responses to N rates with maximum yields (20.6 and 17.1 Mg ha −1 , respectively) at an N rate of 150 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen accumulation in corn at harvest, which showed a row spacing x N rate interaction, had a linear response to N rates at 0.38 m row spacing.

Outcome
Nitrogen accumulation at harveste3
Qualifier
linear response to N rates at 0.38‐m spacinge3

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen accumulation at harvest, which had a row spacing × N rate interaction, had a linear response to N rates at 0.38‐m spacing and a quadratic response at 0.76‐m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen accumulation in corn at harvest had a quadratic response to N rates at 0.76 m row spacing.

Outcome
Nitrogen accumulation at harveste3
Qualifier
quadratic response at 0.76‐m spacinge3

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen accumulation at harvest, which had a row spacing × N rate interaction, had a linear response to N rates at 0.38‐m spacing and a quadratic response at 0.76‐m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Dairy farmers in the northeastern USA can produce corn silage at similar plant densities and N fertility regardless of row spacing.

Taxon
corn silagee4
Outcome
similar plant densities and N fertilitye4
Setting
northeastern USAe4

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e4

“Dairy farmers in the northeastern USA can produce corn silage at similar plant densities and N fertility, regardless of row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1252 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Dairy producers with excess animal waste could apply slightly more N to narrow-row corn silage because it accumulates more N at harvest.

Taxon
corn silagee5
Outcome
apply slightly more Ne5

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e5

“Dairy producers who have excess animal waste could apply slightly more N to narrow‐row corn silage because it accumulates more N at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1393 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.