Paper · 2012 · LWT

Phytochemical composition and antioxidant activity of peach as affected by pasteurization and storage duration

Ana Oliveira; Manuela Pintado; Domingos P.F. Almeida

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
64
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Fruit are very perishable and are often preserved as heat-processed foods. Clingstone peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch ‘Catherine’] fruit were heat-treated at 90 °C for 5 min and stored under aseptic conditions at room temperature (ca. 22 °C) for 90 days. Significant reductions in total carotenoids were observed immediately after pasteurization but total antioxidant activity and the concentration of total phenolics were unaffected. Pasteurization induced significant reductions in the concentration of protocatechuic acid (from 10.2 to 5.8 μg/g fw), zexanthin and β-cryptoxanthin. Significant reduction in antioxidant activity, expressed as ascorbic acid equivalents, from 0.52 to 0.25 mg/g fw, was observed during storage of pasteurized peach for 90 days. Total phenolics, expressed as gallic acid equivalents, decreased during storage from 0.57 to 0.28 mg/g fw and total carotenoids decreased from 4.0 to 1.3 μg/g fw. Procyanidin B1 increased from 15.8 to 26.8 μg/g fw and chlorogenic acid and neochlorogenic acid increased 35 and 43%, respectively. (−)-Epicatechin decreased during storage from 13.1 to 4.0 μg/g fw and quercetin-3-glucoside from 7.3 to 4.4 μg/g fw. All carotenoids decrease significantly with the exception of zeaxanthin, which increased during storage. Storage duration strongly affected the concentration of phenolics and carotenoids in pasteurized peach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteurization significantly reduced total carotenoids.

Treatment
pasteurizatione0
Outcome
total carotenoidse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reductions in total carotenoids were observed immediately after pasteurization but total antioxidant activity and the concentration of total phenolics were unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteurization left total antioxidant activity and total phenolics unaffected.

Treatment
pasteurizatione0
Outcome
total antioxidant activity and the concentration of total phenolicse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reductions in total carotenoids were observed immediately after pasteurization but total antioxidant activity and the concentration of total phenolics were unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteurization reduced protocatechuic acid from 10.2 to 5.8 μg/g fw.

Treatment
Pasteurizatione0
Outcome
concentration of protocatechuic acide0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
from 10.2 to 5.8 μg/g fwe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pasteurization induced significant reductions in the concentration of protocatechuic acid (from 10.2 to 5.8 μg/g fw), zexanthin and β-cryptoxanthin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteurization reduced zexanthin.

Treatment
Pasteurizatione0
Outcome
zexanthine0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pasteurization induced significant reductions in the concentration of protocatechuic acid (from 10.2 to 5.8 μg/g fw), zexanthin and β-cryptoxanthin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteurization reduced β-cryptoxanthin.

Treatment
Pasteurizatione0
Outcome
β-cryptoxanthine0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pasteurization induced significant reductions in the concentration of protocatechuic acid (from 10.2 to 5.8 μg/g fw), zexanthin and β-cryptoxanthin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activity declined from 0.52 to 0.25 mg/g fw over 90 days of storage.

Treatment
storage of pasteurized peach for 90 dayse0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
from 0.52 to 0.25 mg/g fwe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reduction in antioxidant activity, expressed as ascorbic acid equivalents, from 0.52 to 0.25 mg/g fw, was observed during storage of pasteurized peach for 90 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolics declined from 0.57 to 0.28 mg/g fw during storage.

Treatment
storagee0
Outcome
Total phenolicse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
from 0.57 to 0.28 mg/g fwe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolics, expressed as gallic acid equivalents, decreased during storage from 0.57 to 0.28 mg/g fw and total carotenoids decreased from 4.0 to 1.3 μg/g fw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total carotenoids declined from 4.0 to 1.3 μg/g fw during storage.

Treatment
storagee1
Outcome
total carotenoidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
from 4.0 to 1.3 μg/g fwe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total carotenoids decreased from 4.0 to 1.3 μg/g fw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased during storage from 0.57 to 0.28 mg/g fw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Procyanidin B1 increased from 15.8 to 26.8 μg/g fw.

Treatment
storagee1
Outcome
Procyanidin B1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
from 15.8 to 26.8 μg/g fwe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Procyanidin B1 increased from 15.8 to 26.8 μg/g fw and chlorogenic acid and neochlorogenic acid increased 35 and 43%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased during storage from 0.57 to 0.28 mg/g fw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorogenic acid increased 35% during storage.

Treatment
storagee1
Outcome
chlorogenic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35 and 43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorogenic acid and neochlorogenic acid increased 35 and 43%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased during storage from 0.57 to 0.28 mg/g fw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neochlorogenic acid increased 43% during storage.

Treatment
storagee1
Outcome
neochlorogenic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorogenic acid and neochlorogenic acid increased 35 and 43%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased during storage from 0.57 to 0.28 mg/g fw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epicatechin decreased from 13.1 to 4.0 μg/g fw during storage.

Treatment
storagee0
Outcome
(−)-Epicatechine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
from 13.1 to 4.0 μg/g fwe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(−)-Epicatechin decreased during storage from 13.1 to 4.0 μg/g fw and quercetin-3-glucoside from 7.3 to 4.4 μg/g fw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercetin-3-glucoside decreased from 7.3 to 4.4 μg/g fw during storage.

Treatment
storagee0
Outcome
quercetin-3-glucosidee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
from 7.3 to 4.4 μg/g fwe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(−)-Epicatechin decreased during storage from 13.1 to 4.0 μg/g fw and quercetin-3-glucoside from 7.3 to 4.4 μg/g fw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All carotenoids except zeaxanthin decreased significantly during storage.

Treatment
storagee0
Outcome
All carotenoidse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
with the exception of zeaxanthine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All carotenoids decrease significantly with the exception of zeaxanthin, which increased during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeaxanthin increased during storage.

Treatment
storagee0
Outcome
zeaxanthine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the exception of zeaxanthin, which increased during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.