Paper · 2008 · Functional Ecology

Nonlinear effects of plant root and shoot jasmonic acid application on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its parasitoid Cotesia glomerata

Bao‐Li Qiu; Jeffrey A. Harvey; Ciska E. Raaijmakers; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1 Plant species employ several direct and indirect defence strategies to protect themselves against insect herbivores. Most studies, however, have focused on shoot-induced responses. Much less is known about interactions between below- and above-ground herbivores and how these may affect their respective parasitoids. 2 Here, we quantify the impact of below-ground induced responses vs. that of above-ground induced responses in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata. Jasmonic acid (JA) was applied to induce the plants above- or below-ground. The glucosinolate, sugar and amino acid levels of the leaves were analysed. 3 Pieris brassicae larvae grew significantly slower on shoot JA-induced (SJA) plants than on root JA-induced (RJA) and control plants, which were treated with acidic water. On RJA and control plants they showed similar developmental trajectories. Pupal masses, survival till eclosion and egg load, however, were similar on all plants. 4 The development of C. glomerata larvae on SJA plants was significantly longer than that on RJA and control plants. In contrast, the parasitoid's pupal stage lasted longer in hosts feeding on control plants. The total developmental times eventually were similar in all groups. However, the masses of male and female C. glomerata adults that developed hosts on control and RJA plants were significantly larger than those from hosts on SJA plants. JA application increased total glucosinolate contents and decreased the sugars and total amino acids levels independent of whether JA was applied. However, the trajectories of herbivore-induced glucosinolate levels differed between RJA and SJA plants. 5 These results show that the differential effects of above- and below-ground-induced responses on herbivores also affect higher trophic levels in a nonlinear fashion via differential changes in host plant quality. In particular, the indirect effects that below-ground herbivores have on the performance of above-ground parasitoids may exceed the direct effects of plant chemistry on herbivore performance. Consequently, above-ground and below-ground interactions mediated by induced plant responses have the potential to mediate insect community structure and function in complex ways.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pieris brassicae larvae grew significantly more slowly on shoot-induced Brassica than on root-induced or control plants.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Treatment
shoot JA-induced (SJA)e0
Interactor
Pieris brassicaePieris brassicaee0pest
Outcome
Pieris brassicae larvae grewe0
Direction
slowere0
Comparator
root JA-induced (RJA) and control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pieris brassicae larvae grew significantly slower on shoot JA-induced (SJA) plants than on root JA-induced (RJA) and control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–813 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pieris brassicae development was similar on root-induced and control plants.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Treatment
RJAe0
Interactor
Pieris brassicaePieris brassicaee1pest
Outcome
developmental trajectoriese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On RJA and control plants they showed similar developmental trajectories.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–926 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pieris brassicae pupal mass, survival and egg load were similar across plant treatments.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Interactor
Pieris brassicaePieris brassicaee1pest
Outcome
Pupal masses, survival till eclosion and egg loade0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pupal masses, survival till eclosion and egg load, however, were similar on all plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1014 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotesia glomerata larval development lasted significantly longer on shoot-induced plants than on root-induced or control plants.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Treatment
SJA plantse0
Interactor
C. glomerataCotesia glomeratae0other
Outcome
development of C. glomerata larvaee0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
RJA and control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cotesia glomerata
Cotesia glomerata · InteractorLennart Tange on Flickr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The development of C. glomerata larvae on SJA plants was significantly longer than that on RJA and control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotesia glomerata pupal stage lasted longer when its hosts fed on control plants.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Treatment
control plantse0
Interactor
Cotesia glomerataCotesia glomeratae1other
Outcome
parasitoid's pupal stagee0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cotesia glomerata
Cotesia glomerata · InteractorLennart Tange on Flickr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the parasitoid's pupal stage lasted longer in hosts feeding on control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1222 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total Cotesia glomerata development time was similar among treatments.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Interactor
Cotesia glomerataCotesia glomeratae1other
Outcome
total developmental timese0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cotesia glomerata
Cotesia glomerata · InteractorLennart Tange on Flickr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total developmental times eventually were similar in all groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult Cotesia glomerata from control and root-induced plants had significantly greater mass than those from shoot-induced plants.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Treatment
control and RJA plantse0
Interactor
C. glomerataCotesia glomeratae0other
Outcome
masses of male and female C. glomerata adultse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
SJA plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cotesia glomerata
Cotesia glomerata · InteractorLennart Tange on Flickr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the masses of male and female C. glomerata adults that developed hosts on control and RJA plants were significantly larger than those from hosts on SJA plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1460 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jasmonic acid increased total leaf glucosinolate content regardless of application site.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Treatment
JA applicatione0
Outcome
total glucosinolate contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“JA application increased total glucosinolate contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1515 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jasmonic acid decreased leaf sugar and total amino acid levels regardless of application site.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
sugars and total amino acids levelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the sugars and total amino acids levels independent of whether JA was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1607 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivore-induced glucosinolate trajectories differed between root and shoot induction.

Taxon
feral Brassicae1
Outcome
trajectories of herbivore-induced glucosinolate levelse0
Direction
differede0
Comparator
RJA and SJA plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“the trajectories of herbivore-induced glucosinolate levels differed between RJA and SJA plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1712 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a feral Brassica on the performance of Pieris brassicae and its endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–526 · show in text ↑