Paper · 1988 · Agronomy Journal

Phosphate Rock Fertilization in Tilled and No‐Till Low‐Input Systems in the Humid Tropics

Mwenja P. Gichuru; Pedro A. Sanchez

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Application of phosphate rock is of interest to low‐input systems in the humid tropics, because phosphate rock is less expensive than ordinary superphosphate and releases P quickly in acid soils. However, the lack of incorporation in zero‐tillage systems may result in low availability of surface‐applied P. This study was directed toward determining the effects of these two P sources under no‐till and rotovation tillage systems on crop production in a fine‐loamy siliceous, isohyperthermic Typic Paleudult of Yurimaguas, Peru. A rotation of Al‐tolerant cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)‐rice‐cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) was followed for seven consecutive harvests. Grain yields increased with rotovation in the first crop, were not affected by tillage methods during the second and third crops, but decreased with rotovation from the third to the seventh crops. Sechura phosphate rock at a soil pH of 4.5 was as effective as superphosphate in supplying available P. A total of 13.9 Mg ha −1 of rice and 2.5 Mg ha −1 of cowpea grain was produced in seven harvests in newly cleared fields without lime or P application. There were significant responses to P fertilization in one rice crop and in both cowpea crops. On the average, however, rice yield did not respond to P. A single application of 22 kg P ha‐' was sufficient to produce 85% of the maximum yield of cowpea for 2 yr. The results with cowpea indicate that broadcast phosphate rock is a good source of P for low‐input systems on acid soils where acid‐tolerant cultivars are used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotovation increased first-crop grain yield.

Treatment
rotovatione0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first crope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields increased with rotovation in the first crop, were not affected by tillage methods during the second and third crops, but decreased with rotovation from the third to the seventh crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–877 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)‐rice‐cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage methods did not affect grain yields in the second and third crops.

Treatment
tillage methodse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
second and third cropse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields increased with rotovation in the first crop, were not affected by tillage methods during the second and third crops, but decreased with rotovation from the third to the seventh crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–877 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)‐rice‐cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotovation decreased grain yields from the third to the seventh crops.

Treatment
rotovatione0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
third to the seventh cropse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields increased with rotovation in the first crop, were not affected by tillage methods during the second and third crops, but decreased with rotovation from the third to the seventh crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–877 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)‐rice‐cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At soil pH 4.5, Sechura phosphate rock supplied available P as effectively as superphosphate.

Treatment
Sechura phosphate rocke0
Outcome
available Pe0
Direction
as effectivee0
Qualifier
soil pH of 4.5e0
Comparator
superphosphatee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Sechura phosphate rock at a soil pH of 4.5 was as effective as superphosphate in supplying available P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–981 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rice produced 13.9 Mg ha −1 over seven harvests without lime or P application.

Outcome
ricee0
Value
13.9 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
seven harvests in newly cleared fields without lime or P applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 13.9 Mg ha −1 of rice and 2.5 Mg ha −1 of cowpea grain was produced in seven harvests in newly cleared fields without lime or P application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cowpea produced 2.5 Mg ha −1 over seven harvests without lime or P application.

Outcome
cowpea graine0
Value
2.5 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
seven harvests in newly cleared fields without lime or P applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 13.9 Mg ha −1 of rice and 2.5 Mg ha −1 of cowpea grain was produced in seven harvests in newly cleared fields without lime or P application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

rice responded significantly to P fertilization in one rice crop.

Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Outcome
responsese0
Qualifier
one rice crope0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant responses to P fertilization in one rice crop and in both cowpea crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

cowpea responded significantly to P fertilization in both cowpea crops.

Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Outcome
responsese0
Qualifier
both cowpea cropse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant responses to P fertilization in one rice crop and in both cowpea crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average rice yield did not respond to P.

Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
did not responde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the average, however, rice yield did not respond to P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One application of 22 kg P ha‐' produced 85% of maximum cowpea yield for two years.

Treatment
A single application of 22 kg P ha‐'e0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
sufficiente0
Value
85%e0
Qualifier
2 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single application of 22 kg P ha‐' was sufficient to produce 85% of the maximum yield of cowpea for 2 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1394 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast phosphate rock is a good P source for low-input acid-soil systems using acid-tolerant cowpea cultivars.

Outcome
broadcast phosphate rock is a good source of Pe0
Qualifier
low‐input systems on acid soils where acid‐tolerant cultivars are usede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results with cowpea indicate that broadcast phosphate rock is a good source of P for low‐input systems on acid soils where acid‐tolerant cultivars are used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1555 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 419 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 587 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.