Paper · 2007 · Polish Journal of Chemical Technology

The effect of sewage sludge composts and potato pulp on uptaking of macroelements by the grain and straw of the spring triticale

Józefa Krzywy; Edward Krzywy; Ewa Krzywy-Gawrońska; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of sewage sludge composts and potato pulp on uptaking of macroelements by the grain and straw of the spring triticale Taking into consideration the acid pH soil, high content of potassium in relation to nitrogen and phosphorus and the insignificant quantity of heavy metals in the potato pulp and the slight alkaline pH soil as well, high amount of nitrogen and phosphorus in relation to potassium in the municipal sewage sludge, the experiment was carried out in order to define the effect of composts from these waste on uptaking macroelements by the grain and the straw of the Wanad variety spring triticale. The vegetative - pot experiment was carried out on the brown incomplete soil of the slight acid pH (pH KCl 6,1), of the granulometric composition of slight loam (V complex), an average content of available forms of phosphorus and potassium and a high content of magnesium. The obtained results show that the grain and the straw of spring trticale took distinctly more macroelements under the influence the fertilization of the composts with the municipal sewage sludge (30%) and the potato pulp (30%) in comparison with the composts with the 60% participation of the potato pulp. The supplementary mineral fertilization which was used against in comparison to composts, increased uptaking the macroelements by the tested plant. The double dose of composts and mineral fertilizers visibly increased nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, cooper, magnesium and sulphur absorbance by the grain and the straw of spring trticale in comparison with the series with a single dose of composts and a supplementary mineral fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composts containing 30% municipal sludge and 30% potato pulp increased macroelement uptake compared with 60% potato pulp compost.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Organ / stage
grain and the strawe0
Treatment
composts with the municipal sewage sludge (30%) and the potato pulp (30%)e0
Outcome
grain and the straw of spring trticale took distinctly more macroelementse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
composts with the 60% participation of the potato pulpe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The obtained results show that the grain and the straw of spring trticale took distinctly more macroelements under the influence the fertilization of the composts with the municipal sewage sludge (30%) and the potato pulp (30%) in comparison with the composts with the 60% participation of the potato pulp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary mineral fertilization increased macroelement uptake.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
supplementary mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
uptaking the macroelementse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
compostse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The supplementary mineral fertilization which was used against in comparison to composts, increased uptaking the macroelements by the tested plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double compost and mineral fertilizer dose increased grain and straw absorption of six named elements relative to single dose.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
Organ / stage
grain and the strawe0
Treatment
double dose of composts and mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, cooper, magnesium and sulphur absorbance by the grain and the strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
single dose of composts and a supplementary mineral fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The double dose of composts and mineral fertilizers visibly increased nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, cooper, magnesium and sulphur absorbance by the grain and the straw of spring trticale in comparison with the series with a single dose of composts and a supplementary mineral fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–128 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.