Paper · 1979 · Photochemistry and Photobiology

THE CONTROL BY PHYTOCHROME OF NITRATE REDUCTASE IN THE CURD OF LIGHT‐GROWN CAULIFLOWER

G. C. Whitelam; C. B. Johnson; H. Smith

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract— The activity of nitrate reductase from the curd of light‐grown cauliflower ( Brassica oleracea (L) var botrytis (DC) ‘St. Hilary’) is modulated by nitrate and by light. Using broad‐band sources of equal photosynthetically active radiation but with different proportions of red and far‐red light, a linear relationship between nitrate reductase activity and ψ(Estimated phytochrome photoequilibrium) was obtained. This relationship, apparent after 8 h incubation, was maintained and little altered after 48 h incubation. The linearity was apparent between ψE 0.26 and ψE 0.69; ψE 0.26 being no more effective than a dark control. Far‐red reversibility confirmed the involvement of phytochrome. Brief pulses of red light were also used to establish a range of phytochrome photoequilibria within the tissue. Again a linear relationship between ψ and nitrate reductase activity was obtained with a threshold for the response at ψ 0.3. With both monochromatic and broad‐band sources it was seen that neither photon fluence rate nor duration of exposure affected the final activity of the enzyme and that phytochrome was acting solely through ψ (or [Pfr] since phytochrome is stable in this tissue) to bring about these responses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity in cauliflower curd was modulated by nitrate and light.

Material
‘St. Hilary’e0
Organ / stage
curde0
Gene
nitrate reductasee0
Outcome
activity of nitrate reductasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of nitrate reductase from the curd of light‐grown cauliflower ( Brassica oleracea (L) var botrytis (DC) ‘St. Hilary’) is modulated by nitrate and by light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity had a linear relationship with estimated phytochrome photoequilibrium under broad-band light, apparent at 8 h and maintained at 48 h.

Gene
nitrate reductasee0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Qualifier
after 8 h incubatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a linear relationship between nitrate reductase activity and ψ(Estimated phytochrome photoequilibrium) was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–421 · show in text ↑
e1

“This relationship, apparent after 8 h incubation, was maintained and little altered after 48 h incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The linear response occurred between ψE 0.26 and ψE 0.69, with ψE 0.26 no more effective than dark control.

Outcome
linearitye0
Qualifier
between ψE 0.26 and ψE 0.69e0
Comparator
dark controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The linearity was apparent between ψE 0.26 and ψE 0.69; ψE 0.26 being no more effective than a dark control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red reversibility confirmed phytochrome involvement in the response.

Outcome
involvement of phytochromee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Far‐red reversibility confirmed the involvement of phytochrome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under red-light pulses, photoequilibrium and nitrate reductase activity had a linear relationship with a threshold at ψ 0.3.

Gene
nitrate reductasee0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Qualifier
threshold for the response at ψ 0.3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a linear relationship between ψ and nitrate reductase activity was obtained with a threshold for the response at ψ 0.3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photon fluence rate did not affect final nitrate reductase activity.

Gene
NITRATE REDUCTASEt1
Outcome
final activity of the enzymee0
Direction
neithere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither photon fluence rate nor duration of exposure affected the final activity of the enzyme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“NITRATE REDUCTASE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure duration did not affect final nitrate reductase activity.

Outcome
final activity of the enzymee0
Direction
neithere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither photon fluence rate nor duration of exposure affected the final activity of the enzyme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Phytochrome was interpreted as acting solely through ψ or Pfr to regulate nitrate reductase activity.

Outcome
these responsese0
Qualifier
solely through ψe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phytochrome was acting solely through ψ (or [Pfr] since phytochrome is stable in this tissue) to bring about these responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑