Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Phosphorus, Potassium and Phytohormones Promote Chlorophyll Production Differently in Two Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Varieties Grown in Hydroponic Nutrient Solution

Adebusoye Olulayo Onanuga; Ping'an Jiang; Sina M. Adl

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effectiveness of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), zeatin (Z) and their combinations on chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll production was investigated in the hydroponic nutrient solution. The cotton plants were cropped without hormones application in different levels of P and K in the first cropping and with hormones application in the second cropping in high level of PK. In the first cropping, low K and high PK significantly influenced formation of chlorophyll a, b and ab from 83 to 91 days after planting (DAT) while the application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT. However, two cotton varieties planted in two cropping seasons expressed different abilities in time to promote chlorophyll formation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low potassium significantly influenced cotton chlorophyll a, b and ab formation at 83–91 days after planting.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
low Ke0
Outcome
formation of chlorophyll a, b and abe0
Qualifier
from 83 to 91 days after planting (DAT)e0
Setting
hydroponic nutrient solutione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first cropping, low K and high PK significantly influenced formation of chlorophyll a, b and ab from 83 to 91 days after planting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the hydroponic nutrient solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High PK significantly influenced cotton chlorophyll a, b and ab formation at 83–91 days after planting.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
high PKe0
Outcome
formation of chlorophyll a, b and abe0
Qualifier
from 83 to 91 days after planting (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first cropping, low K and high PK significantly influenced formation of chlorophyll a, b and ab from 83 to 91 days after planting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 significantly increased cotton chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and abe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only at 80 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA significantly increased cotton chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and abe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only at 80 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeatin significantly increased cotton chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Ze0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and abe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only at 80 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA x GA3 x 2Z significantly increased cotton chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
IAA x GA3 x 2Ze0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and abe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only at 80 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and ab only at 80 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cotton varieties differed in timing of chlorophyll promotion across the two cropping seasons.

Outcome
different abilities in time to promote chlorophyll formatione0
Qualifier
two cropping seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, two cotton varieties planted in two cropping seasons expressed different abilities in time to promote chlorophyll formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–839 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.