Paper · 1991 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of the apetalous flower character on radiation distribution in the crop canopy, yield and its components in oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

M. S. S. Rao; N. J. Mendham; G. C. Buzza

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals. Experiments between 1984 and 1987 used different growth regulators, plant population densities and irrigation treatments. Apetalous allowed 30 % more short-wave radiation to reach the base of the inflorescence, and reflected only half as much radiation as Marnoo at peak flowering. This allowed leaves to persist and remain active for longer. Apetalous then consistently retained more seeds/pod, each of greater mean weight, at all heights within the crop canopy, resulting in substantially greater yields than Marnoo in most instances. At the highest population density, it retained productive secondary branches, whereas Marnoo had none. Irrigation after flowering increased the yields of both lines by allowing more seeds/pod to be retained, particularly at lower heights in the canopy. In Apetalous, however, even without irrigation, yields remained high. Apetalous does have larger flower parts, other than petals, which could contribute to the larger pods and seeds. This, combined with lower plant populations than Marnoo in some experiments, could have explained some of the effects seen, but the characteristic is worthy of further study in a range of genetic backgrounds and environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apetalous Brassica napus line let 30% more short-wave radiation reach the base of the inflorescence than Marnoo.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Material
Apetalouse0
Outcome
short-wave radiation to reach the base of the inflorescencee1
Direction
moree1
Value
30 %e1
Comparator
Marnooe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apetalous allowed 30 % more short-wave radiation to reach the base of the inflorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–414 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apetalous line reflected only half as much radiation as Marnoo at peak flowering.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Material
Apetalouse0
Outcome
radiatione2
Direction
only half as muche2
Comparator
Marnooe2
Setting
peak floweringe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“and reflected only half as much radiation as Marnoo at peak flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–485 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apetalous line allowed leaves to persist and remain active for longer.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
leaves to persist and remain activee3
Qualifier
for longere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e3

“This allowed leaves to persist and remain active for longer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–546 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apetalous line retained more seeds per pod at all heights within the crop canopy.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Material
Apetalouse4
Outcome
seeds/pode4
Direction
moree4
Setting
within the crop canopye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e4

“Apetalous then consistently retained more seeds/pod, each of greater mean weight, at all heights within the crop canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–667 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apetalous line retained seeds of greater mean weight at all heights within the crop canopy.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Material
Apetalouse4
Outcome
mean weighte4
Direction
greatere4
Setting
within the crop canopye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e4

“Apetalous then consistently retained more seeds/pod, each of greater mean weight, at all heights within the crop canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–667 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apetalous line had substantially greater yields than Marnoo in most instances.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Material
Apetalouse0
Outcome
yieldse5
Direction
substantially greatere5
Qualifier
in most instancese5
Comparator
Marnooe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e5

“resulting in substantially greater yields than Marnoo in most instances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–740 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest population density the apetalous line retained productive secondary branches, whereas Marnoo had none.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Material
Apetalouse0
Treatment
highest population densitye6
Outcome
productive secondary branchese6
Direction
retainede6
Comparator
Marnooe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the highest population density, it retained productive secondary branches, whereas Marnoo had none”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation after flowering increased yields of both lines by allowing more seeds per pod to be retained.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Treatment
Irrigation after floweringe7
Outcome
yieldse7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
by allowing more seeds/pod to be retainede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e7

“Irrigation after flowering increased the yields of both lines by allowing more seeds/pod to be retained, particularly at lower heights in the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–993 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields of the apetalous line remained high even without irrigation.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Material
Apetalouse7
Outcome
yieldse7
Direction
remained highe7
Qualifier
even without irrigatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Brassica napus line that produces flowers with virtually no petals (Apetalous) was compared for its physiological significance with Marnoo, a related cultivar bearing conventional yellow petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–203 · show in text ↑
e7

“In Apetalous, however, even without irrigation, yields remained high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1063 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 29 positive, 13 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

stage · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 24 positive, 19 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.