Paper · 1983 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Chetate toxicity with transplant solutions containing Zn, Mn and Fe chelates for tomatoes

A. Wallace

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A combination of ZnEDTA (19 mg Zn), MnEDTA (14 mg Mn) and FeHEDTA (7 mg Fe) was applied to soil in pots (1000 g soil) with tomato plants to simulate a transplant solution. Severe injury occurred on one set of plants, especially for a 2 × application when the soil was allowed to dry out but not enough to wilt plants. Warm weather contributed to the results. Injury was less intense when soil moisture was maintained near ‐1/3 bar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined ZnEDTA, MnEDTA and FeHEDTA treatment severely injured tomato plants, especially at double application with soil drying.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
A combination of ZnEDTA (19 mg Zn), MnEDTA (14 mg Mn) and FeHEDTA (7 mg Fe)e0
Outcome
Severe injurye0
Qualifier
2 × application when the soil was allowed to dry out but not enough to wilt plantse0
Setting
soil in potse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of ZnEDTA (19 mg Zn), MnEDTA (14 mg Mn) and FeHEDTA (7 mg Fe) was applied to soil in pots (1000 g soil) with tomato plants to simulate a transplant solution. Severe injury occurred on one set of plants, especially for a 2 × application when the soil was allowed to dry out but not enough to wilt plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–326 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm weather contributed to tomato injury.

Outcome
resultse0
Setting
Warm weathere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Warm weather contributed to the results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–367 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maintaining soil moisture near −1/3 bar reduced tomato injury intensity.

Treatment
soil moisture was maintained near ‐1/3 bare0
Outcome
Injurye0
Direction
less intensee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injury was less intense when soil moisture was maintained near ‐1/3 bar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

manganese atom · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.