Paper · 1976 · Crop Science

Influence of Distance from Pollen Plant on Seed Produced by Male‐Sterile Cotton

Joseph O. Moffett; Lee S. Stith; Cahrles W. Shipman

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Because of increasing interest in hybrid cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. a study was made in southern Arizona in 1973 and 1974 to determine a planting pattern of pollinator and male‐sterile rows that would give satisfactory yields of hybrid seed. In 1973 two rows of pollen plants were alternated with 14 rows of male‐sterile plants. The two male‐sterile rows closest to the pollen plants produced 49% more seeds per flower than were produced in the remaining male‐sterile rows. In 1974 an alternating pattern of 2 rows of pollen parents and 6 rows of male‐sterile parents was planted in 12 replications. There were no significant differences in number of seeds produced per flower among these male‐sterile rows. In both years the seeds were a higher percentage of the total boll weight in bolls from the male sterile plants than in bolls from the pollen plants (68.2 to 60.6 in 1973 and 68.2 to 62.0 in 1974). In both years production of hybrid seed was satisfactory. The male‐sterile plants produced 98% and 79% as many seeds per flower as the pollen plants in 1973 and 1974, respectively. The mean number of bees observed visiting cotton flowers at any given time varied from 0.45 to 10.13 per 100 flowers. Honey bees ( Apis mellifera L.) made 38% of the total bee visits in 1973 and 84% in 1974.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1973, the two male-sterile rows closest to the pollen plants produced 49% more seeds per flower than the remaining male-sterile rows.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
closest to the pollen plantse1
Outcome
seeds per flowere1
Direction
moree1
Value
49%e1
Comparator
remaining male‐sterile rowse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“The two male‐sterile rows closest to the pollen plants produced 49% more seeds per flower than were produced in the remaining male‐sterile rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1974, the male-sterile rows did not differ significantly in seeds produced per flower.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
alternating patterne3
Outcome
number of seeds produced per flowere2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were no significant differences in number of seeds produced per flower among these male‐sterile rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–709 · show in text ↑
e3

“an alternating pattern of 2 rows of pollen parents and 6 rows of male‐sterile parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds made a higher percentage of total boll weight in bolls from male-sterile plants than in bolls from pollen plants.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
male sterile plantse4
Outcome
percentage of the total boll weighte4
Direction
highere4
Value
68.2 to 60.6 in 1973 and 68.2 to 62.0 in 1974e5
Comparator
bolls from the pollen plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e4

“In both years the seeds were a higher percentage of the total boll weight in bolls from the male sterile plants than in bolls from the pollen plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–859 · show in text ↑
e5

“(68.2 to 60.6 in 1973 and 68.2 to 62.0 in 1974)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Male-sterile plants produced 98% and 79% as many seeds per flower as pollen plants in 1973 and 1974.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
male‐sterile plantse6
Outcome
seeds per flowere6
Direction
as manye6
Value
98% and 79%e6
Comparator
pollen plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e6

“The male‐sterile plants produced 98% and 79% as many seeds per flower as the pollen plants in 1973 and 1974, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bees visited cotton flowers at a mean of 0.45 to 10.13 visits per 100 flowers.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Interactor
beesAnthophilae7pollinator
Outcome
mean number of bees observed visiting cotton flowerse7
Value
0.45 to 10.13 per 100 flowerse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e7

“The mean number of bees observed visiting cotton flowers at any given time varied from 0.45 to 10.13 per 100 flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1206 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honey bees made 38% of total bee visits in 1973.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Interactor
Apis melliferaApis melliferae7pollinator
Outcome
total bee visitse6
Value
38%e6
Qualifier
in 1973e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Apis mellifera
Apis mellifera · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e6

“made 38% of the total bee visits in 1973”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1280 · show in text ↑
e7

“Apis mellifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honey bees made 84% of total bee visits in 1974.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Interactor
Apis melliferaApis melliferae7pollinator
Outcome
total bee visitse6
Value
84%e5
Qualifier
in 1974e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Apis mellifera
Apis mellifera · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e6

“made 38% of the total bee visits in 1973”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1280 · show in text ↑
e7

“Apis mellifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1238 · show in text ↑
e5

“and 84% in 1974”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1296 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid seed production was satisfactory in both years.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
production of hybrid seede6
Qualifier
satisfactorye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e6

“In both years production of hybrid seed was satisfactory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–965 · show in text ↑

maleate(2-) · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.