Paper · 1979 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Influence of Six Years of No‐tillage and Conventional Plowing on Fertilizer Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) on an Alfisol in the Tropics

R. Lal

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of four rates of N (0, 40, 80, and 120 kg/ha) and three rates of P (0, 13, and 26 kg/ha) on maize ( Zea mays L.) response were investigated for no‐tillage and conventionally plowed plots on an Alfisol in southwestern Nigeria. These, experiments were conducted for three consecutive seasons. Notillage treatments yielded more than conventionally plowed plots in all three seasons. The mean yields were 2.90 and 2.42 metric tons/ha, respectively. There was no effect of P on grain yield. Nitrogen application had a significant effect on grain yield in all three seasons. Relative grain yield in the plowed plots without N application was 0.85 of that in no‐tillage plots. These results, obtained 6 years after adopting these tillage systems, are contradictory to those obtained in the first year of adopting these tillage practices. Leaf concentration of N was affected only by levels of N application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage yielded more maize than conventional plowing over three seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0e1
Treatment
Notillage treatmentse0e1
Outcome
yieldse0e1
Direction
moree0e1
Value
2.90 and 2.42 metric tons/hae0e1
Comparator
conventionally plowed plotse0e1
Setting
all three seasonse0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Notillage treatments yielded more than conventionally plowed plots in all three seasons. The mean yields were 2.90 and 2.42 metric tons/ha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–465 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.) response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus had no effect on maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0e1
Treatment
Pe0e1
Outcome
grain yielde0e1
Direction
no effecte0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of P on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–505 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.) response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly affected grain yield in all three seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0e1
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0e1
Outcome
grain yielde0e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application had a significant effect on grain yield in all three seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–588 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.) response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without nitrogen, plowed-plot yield was 0.85 of no-tillage yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0e1
Treatment
plowed plots without N applicatione0e1
Outcome
Relative grain yielde0e1
Direction
lowerinferrede0e1
Value
0.85e0e1
Comparator
no‐tillage plotse0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative grain yield in the plowed plots without N application was 0.85 of that in no‐tillage plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.) response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen concentration varied only with nitrogen application level.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0e1
Treatment
levels of N applicatione0e1
Outcome
Leaf concentration of Ne0e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf concentration of N was affected only by levels of N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.) response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.