Abstract
Abstract Malting barley is a specialized agricultural crop in which high yields and quality are production objectives. We evaluated the effects of different N rates on barley yields and selected malting quality parameters grown on irrigated silt loam soils (Xerollic calciorthids). Maximum barley yields having acceptable malting quality parameters were obtained when the preplant soil NO3‐N plus fertilizer N was between 100 to 120 kg N/ha. About 33 kg N/ha was taken up by the plants from the mineralization of soil organic N. Higher available N levels decreased malting quality parameters below acceptable levels. Germination percentage was not changed by the different N rates.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum barley yield with acceptable malting quality occurred at 100 to 120 kg N/ha preplant nitrate plus fertilizer N.
- Taxon
- barley
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- preplant soil NO3‐N plus fertilizer N was between 100 to 120 kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- barley yieldse0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Qualifier
- having acceptable malting quality parameterse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Maximum barley yields having acceptable malting quality parameters were obtained when the preplant soil NO3‐N plus fertilizer N was between 100 to 120 kg N/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Plants took up about 33 kg N/ha from soil organic nitrogen mineralization.
- Taxon
- barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Outcome
- taken upe0
- Value
- 33 kg N/hae0
- Qualifier
- Aboute0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“About 33 kg N/ha was taken up by the plants from the mineralization of soil organic N.”
t0“barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher available nitrogen reduced malting quality below acceptable levels.
- Taxon
- barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- Higher available N levelse0
- Outcome
- malting quality parameterse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- below acceptable levelse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Higher available N levels decreased malting quality parameters below acceptable levels.”
t0“barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rates did not change germination percentage.
- Taxon
- barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- different N ratese0
- Outcome
- Germination percentagee0
- Direction
- not changede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Germination percentage was not changed by the different N rates.”
t0“barley”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
106 papers more in this group
See all 110 papers →nitrogen · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
295 papers more in this group
See all 299 papers →fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.