Paper · 1998 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Sugarbeet canopy type and accumulation of plant nitrogen as delineated by aerial photography and global positioning systems

J. T. Moraghan

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest. Since this heterogeneity can affect subsequent soil N mineralization, a study was initiated to determine if the within‐field variation could be identified and located by aerial photography and a global positioning system (GPS). An aerial color photograph was taken of a commercial sugarbeet field prior to harvest. Three reflectance patterns associated with different degrees of canopy greenness ("green”; [G], “yellow‐green”; [YG] and “yellow”; [Y]) were identified readily. Four areas, each approximately 0.8 ha in size, with these three canopy types were selected. The canopy subsites were located by use of a GPS unit. The G, YG, and Y canopy types contained 277, 138, and 85 kg N ha‐1, respectively, in sugarbeet tops. The corresponding leaf N concentrations were 30.6, 20.1, and 15.8 g kg‐1, respectively. Postharvest soil NO3‐N levels in the upper 120 cm of soil were 57, 14, and 10 kg ha‐1 for the G, YG, and Y canopy sites, respectively. Nitrate‐N in sugarbeet tops returned to the soils was at least partly responsible for the higher soil NO3‐N at the G subsites. In contrast to dry matter yield, recoverable sugar yield was significantly less for roots associated with the G‐canopy type than for roots associated with the YG‐and Y‐canopy sites. Aerial photography and GPS technology can increase precision of soil testing for NO3‐N after a sugarbeet crop, help to identify areas of increased soil N mineralization for a subsequent crop, and decrease subsequent N fertilizer use if a variable rate N‐fertilizer applicator is used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The G canopy type contained 277 kg N per hectare in sugarbeet tops.

Material
Ge1
Organ / stage
sugarbeet topse1
Outcome
N contente0
Value
277e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The G, YG, and Y canopy types contained 277, 138, and 85 kg N ha‐1, respectively, in sugarbeet tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The YG canopy type contained 138 kg N per hectare in sugarbeet tops.

Material
YGe1
Organ / stage
sugarbeet topse1
Outcome
N contente0
Value
138e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The G, YG, and Y canopy types contained 277, 138, and 85 kg N ha‐1, respectively, in sugarbeet tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Y canopy type contained 85 kg N per hectare in sugarbeet tops.

Material
Ye1
Organ / stage
sugarbeet topse1
Outcome
N contente0
Value
85e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The G, YG, and Y canopy types contained 277, 138, and 85 kg N ha‐1, respectively, in sugarbeet tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The G canopy type had leaf N concentration of 30.6 g per kg.

Material
Ge1
Organ / stage
leafe2
Outcome
leaf N concentrationse2
Value
30.6e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“The corresponding leaf N concentrations were 30.6, 20.1, and 15.8 g kg‐1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“The G, YG, and Y canopy types contained 277, 138, and 85 kg N ha‐1, respectively, in sugarbeet tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The YG canopy type had leaf N concentration of 20.1 g per kg.

Material
YGe1
Organ / stage
leafe2
Outcome
leaf N concentrationse2
Value
20.1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“The corresponding leaf N concentrations were 30.6, 20.1, and 15.8 g kg‐1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“The G, YG, and Y canopy types contained 277, 138, and 85 kg N ha‐1, respectively, in sugarbeet tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Y canopy type had leaf N concentration of 15.8 g per kg.

Material
Ye1
Organ / stage
leafe2
Outcome
leaf N concentrationse2
Value
15.8e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“The corresponding leaf N concentrations were 30.6, 20.1, and 15.8 g kg‐1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“The G, YG, and Y canopy types contained 277, 138, and 85 kg N ha‐1, respectively, in sugarbeet tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest soil NO3-N in the upper 120 cm was 57 kg per hectare under the G canopy type.

Material
Ge3
Outcome
soil NO3‐N levelse3
Value
57e3
Setting
upper 120 cm of soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“Postharvest soil NO3‐N levels in the upper 120 cm of soil were 57, 14, and 10 kg ha‐1 for the G, YG, and Y canopy sites, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest soil NO3-N in the upper 120 cm was 14 kg per hectare under the YG canopy type.

Material
YGe3
Outcome
soil NO3‐N levelse3
Value
14e3
Setting
upper 120 cm of soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“Postharvest soil NO3‐N levels in the upper 120 cm of soil were 57, 14, and 10 kg ha‐1 for the G, YG, and Y canopy sites, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest soil NO3-N in the upper 120 cm was 10 kg per hectare under the Y canopy type.

Material
Ye3
Outcome
soil NO3‐N levelse3
Value
10e3
Setting
upper 120 cm of soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“Postharvest soil NO3‐N levels in the upper 120 cm of soil were 57, 14, and 10 kg ha‐1 for the G, YG, and Y canopy sites, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1100 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-N returned in sugarbeet tops was at least partly responsible for the higher soil NO3-N under the G canopy type.

Compound
Nitrate‐Ne4
Outcome
higher soil NO3‐Ne4
Qualifier
at least partly responsiblee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrate‐N in sugarbeet tops returned to the soils was at least partly responsible for the higher soil NO3‐N at the G subsites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1227 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recoverable sugar yield was significantly lower for the G canopy type than for the YG and Y canopy sites.

Material
G‐canopy typee5
Outcome
recoverable sugar yielde5
Direction
lesse5
Comparator
roots associated with the YG‐and Y‐canopy sitese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e5

“recoverable sugar yield was significantly less for roots associated with the G‐canopy type than for roots associated with the YG‐and Y‐canopy sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1409 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Aerial photography and GPS technology can increase the precision of soil testing for NO3-N in sugarbeet fields.

Outcome
precision of soil testing for NO3‐Ne6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e6

“Aerial photography and GPS technology can increase precision of soil testing for NO3‐N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1497 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Aerial photography and GPS technology can help decrease subsequent N fertilizer use when a variable rate applicator is used.

Outcome
decrease subsequent N fertilizer usee7
Qualifier
if a variable rate N‐fertilizer applicator is usede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable within‐field variation in the N content and appearance of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaf canopies is found often at root harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–153 · show in text ↑
e7

“decrease subsequent N fertilizer use if a variable rate N‐fertilizer applicator is used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1694 · show in text ↑