Paper · 1957 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Results from Subsoiling and Deep Fertilization of Corn for 2 Years

W. K. Robertson; J. G. A. Fiskell; C. E. Hutton; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Data on six soil types in North and West Florida for 2 years were used to evaluate subsoiling and deep placement of fertilizer. Lime, fertilizer, fertilizer plus lime, and fertilizer plus lime plus minor elements placed in the subsoil were compared with subsoiling alone and surface fertilization at low and high rates. Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses. Where organic hardpans existed, as on the Leon fine sand, Ona fine sand, and combinations of these soil types with related soils, yield increases were obtained for subsoiling alone and fertilizer, lime and/or minor elements placed in the subsoil. Responses to fertilizer were related to the chemical composition of the soil profile and rainfall distribution. Better responses were obtained when moisture stress periods occurred during the first part of the season. The Norfolk loamy fine sand, Ruston fine sandy loam and Red Bay fine sandy loam soils contained compact clay zones or plow soles beneath the surface. When drought periods were of short duration, subsoiling and deep placed fertilizer improved corn yields above the check. When the drought period was of 25 days' duration the advantage of having a deeper root system and a larger corn plant was lost. On the Klej fine sand where there was nothing in the profile to impede roots, fertilizer on the surface was as good as. deep placement and subsoiling alone was of no benefit. The residual effects of the subsoiling treatments were generally small. There was some indication that it would be necessary to subsoil annually even though additional fertilizer in the subsoil may not be needed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On soils with organic hardpans, subsoiling alone increased corn yields.

Treatment
subsoiling alonee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
organic hardpans existede1
Setting
Leon fine sand, Ona fine sande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“Where organic hardpans existed, as on the Leon fine sand, Ona fine sand, and combinations of these soil types with related soils, yield increases were obtained for subsoiling alone and fertilizer, lime and/or minor elements placed in the subsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On soils with organic hardpans, fertilizer, lime and/or minor elements placed in the subsoil increased corn yields.

Treatment
fertilizer, lime and/or minor elements placed in the subsoile1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
organic hardpans existede1
Setting
Leon fine sand, Ona fine sande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“Where organic hardpans existed, as on the Leon fine sand, Ona fine sand, and combinations of these soil types with related soils, yield increases were obtained for subsoiling alone and fertilizer, lime and/or minor elements placed in the subsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–680 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Responses to fertilizer were related to the chemical composition of the soil profile and to rainfall distribution.

Treatment
fertilizere2
Outcome
Responses to fertilizere2
Qualifier
chemical composition of the soil profile and rainfall distributione2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e2

“Responses to fertilizer were related to the chemical composition of the soil profile and rainfall distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–792 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn responses were better when moisture stress periods occurred during the first part of the season.

Treatment
moisture stress periods occurred during the first part of the seasone3
Outcome
responsese3
Direction
Bettere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e3

“Better responses were obtained when moisture stress periods occurred during the first part of the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With short drought periods, subsoiling and deep placed fertilizer improved corn yields above the check.

Treatment
subsoiling and deep placed fertilizere4
Outcome
corn yieldse4
Direction
improvede4
Qualifier
drought periods were of short duratione4
Comparator
the checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e4

“When drought periods were of short duration, subsoiling and deep placed fertilizer improved corn yields above the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1169 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With a 25-day drought, the advantage of a deeper root system and larger corn plant was lost.

Treatment
drought period was of 25 days' duratione5
Outcome
advantage of having a deeper root system and a larger corn plante5
Direction
was loste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e5

“When the drought period was of 25 days' duration the advantage of having a deeper root system and a larger corn plant was lost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On Klej fine sand, surface fertilizer gave corn results as good as deep placement.

Treatment
fertilizer on the surfacee6
Outcome
as good ase6
Direction
as good ase6
Comparator
deep placemente6
Setting
Klej fine sande6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e6

“On the Klej fine sand where there was nothing in the profile to impede roots, fertilizer on the surface was as good as. deep placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On Klej fine sand, subsoiling alone gave no benefit to corn.

Treatment
subsoiling alonee7
Outcome
benefite7
Direction
of no benefite7
Setting
Klej fine sande6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e6

“On the Klej fine sand where there was nothing in the profile to impede roots, fertilizer on the surface was as good as. deep placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1433 · show in text ↑
e7

“deep placement and subsoiling alone was of no benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual effects of the subsoiling treatments on corn were generally small.

Treatment
subsoiling treatmentse1
Outcome
residual effects of the subsoiling treatmentse1
Qualifier
generally smalle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“The residual effects of the subsoiling treatments were generally small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1544 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that corn may need subsoiling every year, although additional subsoil fertilizer may not be needed.

Outcome
subsoil annuallye1
Qualifier
even though additional fertilizer in the subsoil may not be needede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields, root distribution and the chemical composition of ear leaves were used to measure responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was some indication that it would be necessary to subsoil annually even though additional fertilizer in the subsoil may not be needed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1685 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.