Paper · 2011 · Korean Journal of Plant Resources

Effect of Mulching Material and Planting Density on Growth and Bulb Development of Shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)

Yong-Cho Cho; Jong-Tae Lee; Yoo-Gyeong Park; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

본 연구는 멀칭재료와 재식방법에 따른 shallot의 생육에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 멀칭비닐 종류별 시험에서 투명 PE필름 처리구에서 흑색 PE필름보다 엽수, 초장, 엽초장, 엽초경이 더 좋았고, 상품수량도 21%나 증수되었다. 그러나 구의 크기별 분포에서는 유의적인 차이가 없었다. Shallot의 재식밀도별 수량은 120 cm 5조(10 a당 20,833주)에서 1,332 kg으로 120 cm 2조(10 a당 12,500주)에서보다 1.7배가 증수되어 밀식재배가 유리하였다. 따라서 shallot의 재배는 투명 PE필름 멀칭에 휴폭 120 cm에 5조가 좋을 것으로 사료된다. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of mulching material and planting density on growth and bulb development of shallot. The transparent PE film was better than black PE film as a mulching material for the overwintering shallot crop. Transparent PE film mulching promoted plant growth and increased marketable yield by 21% as compared with that of the black PE film-mulched crop. However, the bulb size was not significantly affected by the type of mulching film. The height and width of ridge and planting density significantly affected the growth and bulb yield of the moisture sensitive shallot. Bulb yield of the shallot planted in five rows in 120 cm wide ridges (20,833 plants per 10 a) was 1,332 kg per 10 a, which was 1.7 times as high as that by the crop grown in three rows in 120 cm wide ridges (12,500 plants per 10 a). In conclusion, the shallot crop is recommended to be cultivated in five rows in 120 cm ridges mulched with the transparent PE film.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent PE film promoted shallot growth relative to black film.

Treatment
Transparent PE film mulchinge0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
black PE film-mulched crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transparent PE film mulching promoted plant growth and increased marketable yield by 21% as compared with that of the black PE film-mulched crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent PE film increased marketable yield by 21 percent relative to black film.

Treatment
Transparent PE film mulchinge0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
black PE film-mulched crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transparent PE film mulching promoted plant growth and increased marketable yield by 21% as compared with that of the black PE film-mulched crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Film type did not significantly affect bulb size.

Treatment
type of mulching filme0
Outcome
bulb sizee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bulb size was not significantly affected by the type of mulching film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge dimensions and planting density significantly affected shallot growth and bulb yield.

Treatment
height and width of ridge and planting densitye0
Outcome
growth and bulb yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The height and width of ridge and planting density significantly affected the growth and bulb yield of the moisture sensitive shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five rows on 120 cm ridges yielded 1,332 kg per 10 a, 1.7 times the three row crop.

Treatment
five rows in 120 cm wide ridges (20,833 plants per 10 a)e0
Outcome
Bulb yielde0
Direction
as high ase0
Value
1,332 kg per 10 ae0
Qualifier
1.7 timese0
Comparator
three rows in 120 cm wide ridges (12,500 plants per 10 a)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulb yield of the shallot planted in five rows in 120 cm wide ridges (20,833 plants per 10 a) was 1,332 kg per 10 a, which was 1.7 times as high as that by the crop grown in three rows in 120 cm wide ridges (12,500 plants per 10 a)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1170 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend five rows on 120 cm ridges with transparent PE film.

Outcome
cultivated in five rows in 120 cm ridges mulched with the transparent PE filme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shallot crop is recommended to be cultivated in five rows in 120 cm ridges mulched with the transparent PE film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1302 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mulching · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.