Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Film type did not significantly affect bulb size.

A claim from Effect of Mulching Material and Planting Density on Growth and Bulb Development of Shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer) · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Film type did not significantly affect bulb size.

Treatment
type of mulching filme0
Outcome
bulb sizee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bulb size was not significantly affected by the type of mulching film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–802
t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–128

Title

Effect of Mulching Material and Planting Density on Growth and Bulb Development of Shallot (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)

Yong-Cho Cho; Jong-Tae Lee; Yoo-Gyeong Park; et al. Korean Journal of Plant Resources 2011. doi:10.7732/kjpr.2011.24.5.507

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e0d0d449e4d9c480bbc7a7b0f382d2d19d4be41b78a080e23de0e20c6f9c68e6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

mulching · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.