Paper · 2019 · Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology

Study on Different Methods of Weed Management in Onion (Allium cepa L.)

Sheela Barla; R. R. Upasani

17
claims
43
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A weed management study on onion (Allium cepa L.) was conducted at Birsa Agricultural University, Jharkhand, India during winter season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 in a randomized block design comprised of nine weed control treatments consisting plastic mulch, available weeds mulch, straw mulch, cover crops (Fenugreek), oxyfluorfen 0.5 kg/ha pre-emergent (PE), pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha PE, mechanical weeding by Dutch hoe, hand weeding at 20, 40, 60 days after transplanting (DAT) and weedy check. Hand weeding at 20, 40 and 60 DAT was most effective in reducing weed dry matter however it was similar to plastic mulch at all the growth stages of crop during 2016-17, 2017-18 as well as in pooled except at 60 DAT in 2016-17. Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check. Application of plastic mulch recorded 300 and 38 percent higher onion yield during 2016-17, 1959 and 117 percent during 2017-18, 576 and 70 percent higher under pooled data compared to weedy check and hand weeding respectively. Plastic mulch also recorded maximum net return 364136, 380185 and 372160 /ha during 2016-17, 2017-18 and under pooled data similar to net return with application of oxyfluorfen 0.25 kg/ha PE, pendimethalin 1 kg/ha PE and hand weeding during 2016-17 while under pooled data maximum B:C ratio was with plastic mulch and was similar to oxyfluorfen 0.25 kg/ha PE, pendimethalin 1 kg/ha PE and hand weeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding was most effective at reducing weed dry matter and was generally similar to plastic mulch.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Hand weeding at 20, 40 and 60 DATe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
plastic mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding at 20, 40 and 60 DAT was most effective in reducing weed dry matter however it was similar to plastic mulch at all the growth stages of crop during 2016-17, 2017-18 as well as in pooled except at 60 DAT in 2016-17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter by 75.83% at 30 DAT in 2016-17.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75.83e0
Qualifier
2016-17e0
Comparator
weedy checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter by 84.83% at 60 DAT in 2016-17.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
84.83 percente0
Qualifier
2016-17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter by 100% at 30 DAT in 2017-18.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Hand weedinge1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reducede1
Value
100e0
Qualifier
2017-18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter by 89.21% at 60 DAT in 2017-18.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Hand weedinge1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reducede1
Value
89.21 percente0
Qualifier
2017-18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled hand weeding reduced weed dry matter by 98.64% at 30 DAT.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Hand weedinge1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reducede1
Value
98.64e0
Qualifier
pooled data at 30 and 60 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled hand weeding reduced weed dry matter by 88.62% at 60 DAT.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Hand weedinge1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reducede1
Value
88.62 percente0
Qualifier
pooled data at 30 and 60 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch reduced weed dry matter by 70.73% at 30 DAT in 2016-17.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reductione1
Value
70.73e0
Qualifier
2016-17e0
Comparator
weedy checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch reduced weed dry matter by 40.32% at 60 DAT in 2016-17.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reductione1
Value
40.32 percente0
Qualifier
2016-17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch reduced weed dry matter by 100% at 30 DAT in 2017-18.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plastic mulche1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reductione1
Value
100e0
Qualifier
2017-18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch reduced weed dry matter by 93.64% at 60 DAT in 2017-18.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plastic mulche1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reductione1
Value
93.64 percente0
Qualifier
2017-18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled plastic mulch reduced weed dry matter by 98.37% at 30 DAT.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plastic mulche1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reductione1
Value
98.37e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled plastic mulch reduced weed dry matter by 86.52% at 60 DAT.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plastic mulche1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere1
Direction
reductione1
Value
86.52 percente0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding reduced weed dry matter to the extent of 75.83 and 84.83 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 89.21 percent during 2017-18, 98.64 and 88.62 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively and the corresponding reduction in weed dry matter due to application of plastic mulch was 70.73 and 40.32 percent during 2016-17, 100 and 93.64 percent during 2017-18, 98.37 and 86.52 percent under pooled data at 30 and 60 DAT respectively, compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased onion yield relative to weedy check by 300%, 1959%, and 576% in 2016-17, 2017-18, and pooled data.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
300e0
Qualifier
2016-17e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of plastic mulch recorded 300 and 38 percent higher onion yield during 2016-17, 1959 and 117 percent during 2017-18, 576 and 70 percent higher under pooled data compared to weedy check and hand weeding respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased onion yield relative to hand weeding by 38%, 117%, and 70% in 2016-17, 2017-18, and pooled data.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
38 percente0
Comparator
hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of plastic mulch recorded 300 and 38 percent higher onion yield during 2016-17, 1959 and 117 percent during 2017-18, 576 and 70 percent higher under pooled data compared to weedy check and hand weeding respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch gave maximum net returns of 364136, 380185 and 372160 /ha across the two years and pooled data.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Plastic mulche0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
364136e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic mulch also recorded maximum net return 364136, 380185 and 372160 /ha during 2016-17, 2017-18 and under pooled data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled maximum benefit-cost ratio occurred with plastic mulch and was similar to three other treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under pooled data maximum B:C ratio was with plastic mulch and was similar to oxyfluorfen 0.25 kg/ha PE, pendimethalin 1 kg/ha PE and hand weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1823 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

transplanting · weed · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · weed · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

mulching · weed · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.