Paper · 2018 · Journal of Horticultural Research

Onion Crop Response to Regulated Deficit Irrigation under Mulching in Dry Mediterranean Region

Ibrahim Mubarak; Altayeb Hamdan

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Enhancing water productivity for sustainable crop production and water savings represents a major challenge for agricultural water management. Pot experiments under open field conditions were conducted for two years, 2016 and 2017, to assess the effects of regulated deficit irrigation under mulch on onion crop production, following a 2 × 3 factorial experiment with two soil cover systems (wheat straw mulch and no-mulch) and three irrigation levels (100%, 80%, and 60% of crop evapotranspiration), with six replications.The results indicated that onion plants were responsive to straw mulching. Bulb diameter, total yield, dry matter, and water productivity were significantly enhanced under mulch whatever the irrigation level used. The seasonal crop water requirements also considerably decreased (about 33%). The results also showed the sensitivity of onion to water stress. Yield, dry matter, and water productivity were higher under full irrigation compared to the deficit irrigation. However, when mulch was used, regulated deficit irrigation highly significantly improved water productivity and onion crop quality and quantity; and this approach could be a promising management practice to meet water shortage consequences in the dry Mediterranean region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch significantly enhanced onion bulb diameter, total yield and dry matter across irrigation levels.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
Bulb diameter, total yield, dry mattere0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
whatever the irrigation level usede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bulb diameter, total yield, dry matter, and water productivity were significantly enhanced under mulch whatever the irrigation level used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch significantly enhanced onion water productivity across irrigation levels.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bulb diameter, total yield, dry matter, and water productivity were significantly enhanced under mulch whatever the irrigation level used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch decreased seasonal crop water requirements by about 33%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
straw mulchinge1
Outcome
seasonal crop water requirementse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about 33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“The seasonal crop water requirements also considerably decreased (about 33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–823 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion plants were responsive to straw mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation produced higher onion yield, dry matter and water productivity than deficit irrigation.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
full irrigatione0
Outcome
Yield, dry matter, and water productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
deficit irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield, dry matter, and water productivity were higher under full irrigation compared to the deficit irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With mulch, regulated deficit irrigation significantly improved onion water productivity and crop quality and quantity.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
regulated deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
water productivity and onion crop quality and quantitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
when mulch was usede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when mulch was used, regulated deficit irrigation highly significantly improved water productivity and onion crop quality and quantity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1145 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.