Paper · 2000 · Plant Pathology

Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci

Dugdale; Mortimer; Isaac; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
32
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Leaf spot of carrot, caused by the fungus Alternaria dauci , is a common disease of carrot throughout the world. To assess the disease response in different genotypes an in vitro method of assay has been developed. The terminal portion of excised mature leaves from carrot are incubated under lights at 25–26°C for 6 days with spores of A. dauci . After 6 days, chlorophyll and total soluble polyphenol contents of the leaves decline to a low level, whereas in the uninoculated control leaves levels of these compounds are largely unchanged. Electron microscope studies of the effect of infection on the ultrastructure of leaves from both cv. Fancy and wild plants show disintegration of the cell wall, plasmalemma and chloroplast membranes in the region close to the invading fungus. The response to A. dauci shows characteristics compatible with the presence of a phytotoxin. Seedling hypocotyls of the carrot cv. Fancy are used as a source of explants to initiate callus tissue and regenerate embryos. Regenerant somaclone plants show variation in morphology (crown number, height, leaf number, leaf shape and flowering time) and susceptibility to the pathogen as measured by the loss in chlorophyll from infected detached leaves after a 6‐day period. Potentially susceptible and resistant regenerant plants are identified by the low and high chlorophyll levels, respectively, in excised leaves 6 days after infection. Selected high‐ and low‐chlorophyll regenerant plants and seedling‐derived cv. Fancy are self‐pollinated, then the seeds are used to produce a progeny generation, which is assessed for morphological changes and disease resistance as before. The response of leaves of progeny plants to infection shows that the plants derived from high‐chlorophyll regenerants still show a higher chlorophyll level after infection compared with leaves derived from low‐chlorophyll and control plants. High chlorophyll levels in the presence of infection in the progeny of high‐chlorophyll regenerants suggest that the capacity to resist infection in the selected somaclones is inherited.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An excised-leaf assay was developed to assess carrot disease response.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
method of assaye0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“an in vitro method of assay has been developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected carrot leaves lost chlorophyll and total soluble polyphenols after six days.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
infectede1
Interactor
Alternaria dauciAlternaria daucit0pathogen
Outcome
chlorophyll and total soluble polyphenol contentse0
Direction
declinee0
Comparator
uninoculated control leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 6 days, chlorophyll and total soluble polyphenol contents of the leaves decline to a low level, whereas in the uninoculated control leaves levels of these compounds are largely unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“susceptibility to the pathogen as measured by the loss in chlorophyll from infected detached leaves after a 6‐day period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninoculated carrot leaves retained chlorophyll and polyphenol levels.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
levels of these compoundse0
Direction
largely unchangede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“in the uninoculated control leaves levels of these compounds are largely unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection disintegrated cell wall, plasmalemma and chloroplast membranes near the fungus in Fancy and wild carrot leaves.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Material
cv. Fancy and wild plantse0
Interactor
Alternaria dauciAlternaria daucit0pathogen
Outcome
disintegration of the cell wall, plasmalemma and chloroplast membranese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Electron microscope studies of the effect of infection on the ultrastructure of leaves from both cv. Fancy and wild plants show disintegration of the cell wall, plasmalemma and chloroplast membranes in the region close to the invading fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–783 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The carrot response to A. dauci was compatible with a phytotoxin.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Interactor
A. dauciAlternaria daucie0pathogen
Outcome
response to A. daucie0
Qualifier
compatible with the presence of a phytotoxine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The response to A. dauci shows characteristics compatible with the presence of a phytotoxin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerant carrot somaclones varied in morphology.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Material
Regenerant somaclone plantse0
Outcome
variation in morphologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Regenerant somaclone plants show variation in morphology (crown number, height, leaf number, leaf shape and flowering time)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerant carrot somaclones varied in susceptibility to the pathogen.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Interactor
Alternaria dauciAlternaria daucit0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility to the pathogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“susceptibility to the pathogen as measured by the loss in chlorophyll from infected detached leaves after a 6‐day period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1253 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-chlorophyll regenerants were identified as potentially resistant and low-chlorophyll regenerants as potentially susceptible.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Interactor
Alternaria dauciAlternaria daucit0pathogen
Outcome
susceptible and resistant regenerant plantse0
Comparator
low and high chlorophyll levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Potentially susceptible and resistant regenerant plants are identified by the low and high chlorophyll levels, respectively, in excised leaves 6 days after infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1420 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Progeny of high-chlorophyll regenerants retained higher chlorophyll after infection than progeny of low-chlorophyll and control plants.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Material
high‐chlorophyll regenerantse0
Interactor
Alternaria dauciAlternaria daucit0pathogen
Outcome
chlorophyll levele0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low‐chlorophyll and control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants derived from high‐chlorophyll regenerants still show a higher chlorophyll level after infection compared with leaves derived from low‐chlorophyll and control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1902 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance capacity in selected carrot somaclones appeared inherited.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Material
selected somaclonese0
Interactor
Alternaria dauciAlternaria daucit0pathogen
Outcome
capacity to resist infectione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“High chlorophyll levels in the presence of infection in the progeny of high‐chlorophyll regenerants suggest that the capacity to resist infection in the selected somaclones is inherited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2089 · show in text ↑

infection · Alternaria dauci · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.