Paper · 1989 · Phytopathology

The Effects of Heat Treatment and Inoculum Concentration on Growth and Sporulation ofPenicilliumspp. on Corn Genotypes in Storage

Bamo Yao

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Yao, B., and Tuite, J. 1989. The effects of heat treatment and inoculum concentration on growth and sporulation of Penicillium spp. on corn genotypes in storage. Phytopathology 79:1101-1104. The effects of heat treatment and inoculum concentration of Penicillium was greater for the resistant hybrids but the disease rankings among the brevi-compactum, P. cyclopium, and P. viridicatum on storability of corn genotypes remained. The heat-treated resistant hybrids did not support kernels were determined in separate tests for 10 genotypes of dent corn significantly more sporulation of Penicillium than the unheated, susand a visual flint (VF) selection. Hand-shelled corn grown during ceptible genotypes. In three tests, a total of I I corn genotypes were 1983-1985 was used. Kernels of B73 X Mo17 and Dekalb XL67, resistant, inoculated with 2 X 10' to l04 or 2 X 103 to l0' spores of Penicillium and H95 very susceptible and VF, moderately susceptible to storage spp. per gram of corn and stored at 13-14 C and 88% RH. Increasing Penicillia were heated at 80 C for 20 min, then inoculated with 2 X 103 the inoculum to either 104 or l05 spores/g generally had no significant spores/g and stored at 88% RH and 14 C for 49 days. Host reaction effect on relative resistance as measured by propagules and visible mold, was determined by a visible mold rating on individual kernels and number although there was an increase in propagules with an increase in the of propagules isolated after dilution on a modified potato-dextrose agar. amount of inoculum, particularly when 2 X 104 or 10 spores/g was used. Molding was substantially increased by the heat treatment as measured There appeared to be a more defined separation of hybrids with inoculum by propagules and less so by visible mold for all four genotypes. Increase at 2 X 104 and 105 than at 2 X 103 spores/g. Additional keywords: maize, storage molds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment substantially increased molding in all four corn genotypes.

Treatment
heat treatmente0
Interactor
PenicilliumPenicilliumt1pathogene0
Outcome
Moldinge0
Direction
substantially increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Molding was substantially increased by the heat treatment as measured There appeared to be a more defined separation of hybrids with inoculum by propagules and less so by visible mold for all four genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
t1

“Penicilliumspp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher inoculum generally did not significantly change relative resistance of corn genotypes.

Treatment
inoculum to either 104 or l05 spores/ge0
Interactor
Penicilliae0pathogen
Outcome
relative resistancee0
Direction
no significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing Penicillia were heated at 80 C for 20 min, then inoculated with 2 X 103 the inoculum to either 104 or l05 spores/g generally had no significant spores/g and stored at 88% RH and 14 C for 49 days. Host reaction effect on relative resistance as measured by propagules and visible mold,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium propagules increased with higher inoculum.

Treatment
increase in the of propagules isolated after dilution on a modified potato-dextrose agar. amount of inoculume0
Interactor
PenicilliumPenicilliumt1pathogene0
Outcome
propagulese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although there was an increase in propagules with an increase in the of propagules isolated after dilution on a modified potato-dextrose agar. amount of inoculum, particularly when 2 X 104 or 10 spores/g was used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
t1

“Penicilliumspp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑

heat · Penicillium · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 93 positive, 67 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.