Paper · 1993 · Journal of Phytopathology

Systemic Induction of Resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris L. to Tobacco Necrosis Virus (TNV) by Uromyces phaseoli (Pers.) Wint.

B. Kutzner; K. ‐H. Hellwald; H. Buchenauer

17
claims
33
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Preinoculation of primary half leaves or whole primary leaves of bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto) with Uromyces phaseoli induced resistance against tobacco necrosis virus (TNV) in the opposite half leaves and in the trifoliate leaves, respectively. For expression of systemically induced resistance an interval of at least 4 days between primary and challenge inoculation was required. The most pronounced effectiveness was found after an induction period of 6 days. Preinfectional treatment with intercellular washing fluids extracted from rust infected bean leaves (IWF‐R) also reduced disease incidence of TNV. Extracts taken 6 days after rust inoculation induced the most pronounced effect on resistance. For induction of resistance an interval of at least three days between application of IWF‐R and TNV‐inoculation was necessary. IWFs from healthy leaves (IWF‐H) did not induce resistance to TNV. The disease reductions of systemic protection by IWF‐R in the untreated primary half leaves and in the trifoliate leaves averaging 50%. The IWF‐R could be diluted to 1/4 of its original concentration without appreciable loss of the resistance‐inducing capacity. Besides the resistance inducing effects, the IWF‐R and in addition IWF‐H showed virus inactivating activity; this effect was restricted to the treated leaf area. When IWFs were applied at short time intervals either (0–8 h) before or (0–4 h) after TNV inoculation, the number of local lesions was markedly reduced. Increasing the pre‐ or postinfectional time intervals (0.5–2 dai or 6–8 hpi) diminished the activity significantly. The effectiveness of IWF‐R increased at prolonged preinfectional time intervals (e.g. 3 and 4 dai) while extracts of healthy plants were ineffective. The biphasic pattern of activity indicates that IWF‐R contains ingredients reducing virus infectivity and inducing resistance to TNV. When the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D and the translation inhibitor cycloheximide were applied simultaneously with IWF‐R 3 dai the resistance inducing effect of IWF‐R was prevented. In preliminary ultrafiltration experiments, the molecular size of the inducing ingredients of IWF‐R could be limited to 10–20 kd and those of the virus inactivating compounds to 1–5 kd.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preinoculation with Uromyces phaseoli induced systemic TNV resistance in bean.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Material
Pintoe0
Treatment
Preinoculation of primary half leaves or whole primary leavese0
Interactor
tobacco necrosis virusunidentified tobacco necrosis viruse0pathogen
Second interactor
Uromyces phaseoliUromyces phaseolie0pathogen
Outcome
resistance against tobacco necrosis virus (TNV)e0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Uromyces phaseoli
Uromyces phaseoli · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series from United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preinoculation of primary half leaves or whole primary leaves of bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto) with Uromyces phaseoli induced resistance against tobacco necrosis virus (TNV) in the opposite half leaves and in the trifoliate leaves, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–267 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic resistance required at least four days between primary and challenge inoculation and peaked after six days.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
systemically induced resistancee0
Value
at least 4 dayse0
Qualifier
induction period of 6 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For expression of systemically induced resistance an interval of at least 4 days between primary and challenge inoculation was required. The most pronounced effectiveness was found after an induction period of 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–485 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust-infected leaf washing fluid reduced TNV disease incidence in bean.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
intercellular washing fluids extracted from rust infected bean leaves (IWF‐R)e0
Outcome
disease incidence of TNVe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preinfectional treatment with intercellular washing fluids extracted from rust infected bean leaves (IWF‐R) also reduced disease incidence of TNV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts taken six days after rust inoculation induced the strongest resistance effect.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
most pronounced effect on resistancee0
Qualifier
6 days after rust inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts taken 6 days after rust inoculation induced the most pronounced effect on resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–727 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At least three days between IWF-R application and TNV inoculation was necessary for induced resistance.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
induction of resistancee0
Value
at least three dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For induction of resistance an interval of at least three days between application of IWF‐R and TNV‐inoculation was necessary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–854 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Washing fluid from healthy leaves did not induce TNV resistance.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
IWFs from healthy leaves (IWF‐H)e0
Outcome
resistance to TNVe0
Direction
did not inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IWFs from healthy leaves (IWF‐H) did not induce resistance to TNV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–921 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IWF-R systemic protection reduced TNV disease by an average of 50%.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
IWF‐Re0
Outcome
disease reductions of systemic protectione0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease reductions of systemic protection by IWF‐R in the untreated primary half leaves and in the trifoliate leaves averaging 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IWF-R retained resistance-inducing capacity after dilution to one-quarter concentration.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
IWF‐Re0
Outcome
resistance‐inducing capacitye0
Direction
without appreciable losse0
Value
1/4e0
Comparator
original concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The IWF‐R could be diluted to 1/4 of its original concentration without appreciable loss of the resistance‐inducing capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1183 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IWF-R and IWF-H inactivated virus locally in treated leaf areas.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
virus inactivating activitye0
Qualifier
restricted to the treated leaf areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the IWF‐R and in addition IWF‐H showed virus inactivating activity; this effect was restricted to the treated leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IWF application near TNV inoculation markedly reduced local lesions.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
IWFse0
Outcome
number of local lesionse0
Direction
markedly reducede0
Qualifier
either (0–8 h) before or (0–4 h) after TNV inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When IWFs were applied at short time intervals either (0–8 h) before or (0–4 h) after TNV inoculation, the number of local lesions was markedly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1498 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer pre- or postinfection intervals significantly diminished IWF activity.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
Increasing the pre‐ or postinfectional time intervalse0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
diminishede0
Qualifier
0.5–2 dai or 6–8 hpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the pre‐ or postinfectional time intervals (0.5–2 dai or 6–8 hpi) diminished the activity significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IWF-R efficacy increased at prolonged preinfection intervals, whereas healthy-plant extracts were ineffective.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
prolonged preinfectional time intervalse0
Outcome
effectiveness of IWF‐Re0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
3 and 4 daie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effectiveness of IWF‐R increased at prolonged preinfectional time intervals (e.g. 3 and 4 dai) while extracts of healthy plants were ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1764 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biphasic activity pattern suggests IWF-R contains agents that inactivate virus and induce resistance.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
reducing virus infectivity and inducing resistance to TNVe0
Qualifier
biphasic pattern of activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biphasic pattern of activity indicates that IWF‐R contains ingredients reducing virus infectivity and inducing resistance to TNV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1898 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinomycin D applied with IWF-R prevented resistance induction.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
actinomycin De0
Outcome
resistance inducing effect of IWF‐Re0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D and the translation inhibitor cycloheximide were applied simultaneously with IWF‐R 3 dai the resistance inducing effect of IWF‐R was prevented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2089 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycloheximide applied with IWF-R prevented resistance induction.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
cycloheximidee0
Outcome
resistance inducing effect of IWF‐Re0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D and the translation inhibitor cycloheximide were applied simultaneously with IWF‐R 3 dai the resistance inducing effect of IWF‐R was prevented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2089 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preliminary ultrafiltration limited the size of IWF-R resistance-inducing ingredients to 10–20 kd.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
molecular size of the inducing ingredients of IWF‐Re0
Value
10–20 kde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the molecular size of the inducing ingredients of IWF‐R could be limited to 10–20 kd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2135–2219 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preliminary ultrafiltration limited the size of virus-inactivating compounds to 1–5 kd.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
virus inactivating compoundse0
Value
1–5 kde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those of the virus inactivating compounds to 1–5 kd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2224–2275 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, cv. Pinto)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–117 · show in text ↑

cycloheximide · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

infection · unidentified tobacco necrosis virus · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.