Paper · 1992 · Genome

Evaluation of transgenic canola plants under field conditions

M. Arnoldo; C. L. Baszczynski; G. Bellemare; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Eleven independent transgenic canola (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L. cv. Westar and Regent) lines were evaluated in the field. The plants carried a neomycin phosphotransferase (NPTII) gene for kanamycin resistance that was introduced via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. NPTII enzyme assays, Southern blot by hybridizations and progeny analysis, confirmed the stable, heritable integration and expression of the introduced NPTII gene. A number of agronomic characteristics evaluated under field conditions, including maturity yield, and oil and protein content, were all statistically comparable between the transformed and nontransforemd platns. These results indicate that canola can be genetically engineered successfully, and that the Agrobacterium-based transformation system employed does not induced any adverse effects on the intrinsic agronomic and qualitative traits critical to the agricultural industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introduced NPTII showed stable, heritable integration and expression in canola.

Gene
NPTIIe0
Outcome
stable, heritable integration and expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPTII enzyme assays, Southern blot by hybridizations and progeny analysis, confirmed the stable, heritable integration and expression of the introduced NPTII gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–440 · show in text ↑
e1

“transgenic canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transformed and nontransformed canola had statistically comparable maturity and yield.

Treatment
transformede0
Outcome
maturity yielde0
Direction
statistically comparablee0
Comparator
nontransforemd platnse0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A number of agronomic characteristics evaluated under field conditions, including maturity yield, and oil and protein content, were all statistically comparable between the transformed and nontransforemd platns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–653 · show in text ↑
e1

“transgenic canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transformed and nontransformed canola had statistically comparable oil and protein content.

Treatment
transformede0
Outcome
oil and protein contente0
Direction
statistically comparablee0
Comparator
nontransforemd platnse0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A number of agronomic characteristics evaluated under field conditions, including maturity yield, and oil and protein content, were all statistically comparable between the transformed and nontransforemd platns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–653 · show in text ↑
e1

“transgenic canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that Agrobacterium-based transformation can produce genetically engineered canola without adverse agronomic or quality effects.

Outcome
genetically engineered successfullye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola can be genetically engineered successfully, and that the Agrobacterium-based transformation system employed does not induced any adverse effects on the intrinsic agronomic and qualitative traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–883 · show in text ↑

transgenic · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.