Paper · 2007 · Journal of Sensory Studies

CONSUMER ACCEPTABILITY AND SHELF LIFE OF “FLOR DE INVIERNO” PEARS (Pyrus communis L.) UNDER DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS

ANA SALVADOR; PAULA VARELA; SUSANA M. FISZMAN

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two groups of “Flor de Invierno” pears ( Pyrus communis L.), one recently harvested and another stored in a refrigerated controlled atmosphere for 7 months, were studied after storage at 20C in a normal atmosphere. Survival analysis was used to estimate sensory shelf life, which was 29 and 15 days for a 50% rejection probability, or 13 and 7 days for a 25% rejection probability for recently harvested and stored pears, respectively. A consumer panel evaluated the overall acceptability of the pears on a 9‐point hedonic scale. Recently harvested pears obtained higher acceptability scores throughout the 20C storage time. Instrumental firmness measurements were performed with a texture analyzer through a compression test. The results obtained showed that prolonged storage in a controlled atmosphere causes changes in the fruit that lead to lower firmness, lower acceptance scores and, consequently, a shorter sensory shelf life. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The use of survival analysis to study the shelf life of foods is quite a novel technique in which the key concept is to focus the shelf life estimation on consumer rejection. In this study, survival analysis was applied to pears, but can be applied to other fruits or foods. This approach is useful to know the adequate storage time of food without detrimental sensory quality changes that would conduct to the consumer rejection. Normally, loss in sensory quality appears before microbiological spoilage in many food, so this methodology could be used to predict sensory shelf life.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-atmosphere storage for 7 months shortened the sensory shelf life of pears at 50% rejection probability, from 29 days (recently harvested) to 15 days.

Taxon
Pyrus communis L.Pyrus communist0
Treatment
stored in a refrigerated controlled atmosphere for 7 monthse0
Outcome
sensory shelf lifee1
Direction
shortere3
Value
29 and 15 dayse1
Qualifier
50% rejection probabilitye1
Comparator
recently harvestede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pyrus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“one recently harvested and another stored in a refrigerated controlled atmosphere for 7 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“Survival analysis was used to estimate sensory shelf life, which was 29 and 15 days for a 50% rejection probability, or 13 and 7 days for a 25% rejection probability for recently harvested and stored pears, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–443 · show in text ↑
e3

“a shorter sensory shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-atmosphere storage for 7 months shortened the sensory shelf life of pears at 25% rejection probability, from 13 days (recently harvested) to 7 days.

Taxon
Pyrus communis L.Pyrus communist0
Treatment
stored in a refrigerated controlled atmosphere for 7 monthse0
Outcome
sensory shelf lifee1
Direction
shortere3
Value
13 and 7 dayse1
Qualifier
25% rejection probabilitye1
Comparator
recently harvestede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pyrus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“one recently harvested and another stored in a refrigerated controlled atmosphere for 7 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“Survival analysis was used to estimate sensory shelf life, which was 29 and 15 days for a 50% rejection probability, or 13 and 7 days for a 25% rejection probability for recently harvested and stored pears, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–443 · show in text ↑
e3

“a shorter sensory shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–942 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recently harvested pears had higher consumer acceptability scores throughout storage at 20C.

Taxon
Pyrus communis L.Pyrus communist0
Treatment
20C storage timee2
Outcome
acceptability scorese2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pyrus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“Recently harvested pears obtained higher acceptability scores throughout the 20C storage time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged controlled-atmosphere storage lowered the firmness of pears compared with recently harvested fruit.

Taxon
Pyrus communis L.Pyrus communist0
Treatment
prolonged storage in a controlled atmospheree3
Outcome
firmnesse3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
recently harvestede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pyrus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“one recently harvested and another stored in a refrigerated controlled atmosphere for 7 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–164 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results obtained showed that prolonged storage in a controlled atmosphere causes changes in the fruit that lead to lower firmness, lower acceptance scores and, consequently, a shorter sensory shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged controlled-atmosphere storage lowered consumer acceptance scores of pears compared with recently harvested fruit.

Taxon
Pyrus communis L.Pyrus communist0
Treatment
prolonged storage in a controlled atmospheree3
Outcome
acceptance scorese3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
recently harvestede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pyrus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“one recently harvested and another stored in a refrigerated controlled atmosphere for 7 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–164 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results obtained showed that prolonged storage in a controlled atmosphere causes changes in the fruit that lead to lower firmness, lower acceptance scores and, consequently, a shorter sensory shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–942 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The survival-analysis approach is useful for finding the adequate storage time of pears without detrimental sensory quality changes.

Taxon
pearsPyruse4
Outcome
adequate storage timee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In this study, survival analysis was applied to pears, but can be applied to other fruits or foods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1240 · show in text ↑
e5

“This approach is useful to know the adequate storage time of food without detrimental sensory quality changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1351 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.