Paper · 2015 · Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods

Physicochemical properties of wheat grains affected by after-ripening

S. Ma; X.X. Wang; X.L. Zheng; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The current work examines the physicochemical properties of wheat grains after 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 days of storage. Storage time had a considerable influence on the quality of wheat, which remained stable for up to 90-120 days. Compared with freshly harvested wheat, increased storage time resulted in a decrease in catalase activity. However, damaged starch content, flour yield and gluten index increased during storage. The storage period of 60 days positively affected falling number, amylose content and wet gluten content except for reducing sugar content. Additionally, the three wheat varieties differed in terms of quality changes during storage. Results revealed that after-ripening had multiple effects on improving on three traits, which are particularly associated with wheat quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with freshly harvested wheat, increased storage time decreased catalase activity.

Treatment
storage timee1
Outcome
catalase activitye1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
freshly harvested wheate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physicochemical properties of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with freshly harvested wheat, increased storage time resulted in a decrease in catalase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damaged starch content, flour yield and gluten index increased during storage.

Treatment
storagee2
Outcome
damaged starch content, flour yield and gluten indexe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physicochemical properties of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, damaged starch content, flour yield and gluten index increased during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A storage period of 60 days positively affected falling number, amylose content and wet gluten content.

Treatment
storage period of 60 dayse3
Outcome
falling number, amylose content and wet gluten contente3
Direction
positively affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physicochemical properties of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“The storage period of 60 days positively affected falling number, amylose content and wet gluten content except for reducing sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A storage period of 60 days did not positively affect reducing sugar content.

Treatment
storage period of 60 dayse3
Outcome
reducing sugar contente3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physicochemical properties of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“The storage period of 60 days positively affected falling number, amylose content and wet gluten content except for reducing sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–566 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three wheat varieties differed in quality changes during storage.

Material
three wheat varietiese4
Outcome
quality changes during storagee4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physicochemical properties of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e4

“Additionally, the three wheat varieties differed in terms of quality changes during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–659 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage time had a considerable influence on the quality of wheat.

Treatment
Storage timee0
Outcome
quality of wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physicochemical properties of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Storage time had a considerable influence on the quality of wheat, which remained stable for up to 90-120 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–231 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat quality remained stable for up to 90-120 days of storage.

Treatment
Storage timee0
Outcome
quality of wheate0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
up to 90-120 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physicochemical properties of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Storage time had a considerable influence on the quality of wheat, which remained stable for up to 90-120 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–231 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.