Paper · 2013 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Growth and yield potentials of wheat as affected by management practices

Mohammad Saiful Alam

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to study growth and yield potentials of wheat as affected by agronomic practices. The experiment consisted of three factors such as (1) two methods of planting viz. conventional and bed planting (2) four wheat varieties namely Protiva, Sourav, Shatabdi and Prodip and (3) four levels of nitrogen viz. 0, 60, 110 and 160 kg N ha-1. A split- split plot design was used for the experiment with three applications. The highest total dry matter, leaf area index and crop growth rate were observed in bed planting method with 160 kg N ha‑1. Prodip produced the highest total dry matter up to grain filling stage with the application of 160 kg N ha-1. Leaf area index and crop growth rate were higher at booting and tillering stages respectively. Grain yield was higher in bed planting system than conventional one due to improvement in yield components. Grain yield was increased with increasing levels of nitrogen application. Prodip produced the highest grain yield with 160 Kg N ha-1. The highest grain yield was found with the combination of bed planting method and 160 Kg N ha-1 and the lowest was recorded from conventional method at control treatment. The overall results indicate that Prodip showed better performance in bed planting system with 160 Kg N ha-1. Key words: Wheat, growth, management practices, nitrogen and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting with 160 kg N ha‑1 produced the highest total dry matter, leaf area index and crop growth rate.

Treatment
bed planting method with 160 kg N ha‑1e0
Outcome
total dry matter, leaf area index and crop growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total dry matter, leaf area index and crop growth rate were observed in bed planting method with 160 kg N ha‑1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prodip produced the highest total dry matter up to grain filling with 160 kg N ha-1.

Material
Prodipe0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Treatment
160 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prodip produced the highest total dry matter up to grain filling stage with the application of 160 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index was higher at booting.

Organ / stage
bootinge0
Outcome
Leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index and crop growth rate were higher at booting and tillering stages respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop growth rate was higher at tillering.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index and crop growth rate were higher at booting and tillering stages respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting produced higher grain yield than conventional planting.

Treatment
bed planting systeme0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was higher in bed planting system than conventional one due to improvement in yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased with nitrogen application level.

Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was increased with increasing levels of nitrogen application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prodip gave the highest grain yield with 160 Kg N ha-1.

Material
Prodipe0
Treatment
160 Kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prodip produced the highest grain yield with 160 Kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of bed planting and 160 Kg N ha-1 gave the highest grain yield.

Treatment
bed planting method and 160 Kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was found with the combination of bed planting method and 160 Kg N ha-1 and the lowest was recorded from conventional method at control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional planting at the control treatment gave the lowest grain yield.

Treatment
conventional method at control treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was found with the combination of bed planting method and 160 Kg N ha-1 and the lowest was recorded from conventional method at control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted Prodip as performing better under bed planting with 160 Kg N ha-1.

Material
Prodipe0
Treatment
bed planting system with 160 Kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
better performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The overall results indicate that Prodip showed better performance in bed planting system with 160 Kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.