Intervention effectmodel-written summary

November 10 bed planting with the stated irrigation treatment maximized wheat growth and yield components.

A claim from Effect of sowing time, planting methods and irrigation scheduling on yield response, water and radiation-use efficiencies of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Punjab, India · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 10 bed planting with the stated irrigation treatment maximized wheat growth and yield components.

Treatment
10 November under bed planting with I irrigation 2 treatmente0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, number of effective tillerse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop sown on 10 November under bed planting with I irrigation 2 treatment had the maximum dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, number of effective tillers, ear length, grains/ ear and 1,000-grain weight as compared to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–968
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–150

Title

Effect of sowing time, planting methods and irrigation scheduling on yield response, water and radiation-use efficiencies of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Punjab, India

L.K. DHALIWAL; G.S. BUTTAR; P.K. KINGRA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v65i1.2968

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-6f7cbe782249a9f65f011f3cb6e64bf60d1759984788e8115d9c1a2f49950d05 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.

    Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Bed planting with 120 kg N/ha gave a 29% higher economic return than flat planting.

    Bed planting of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) improves nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield compared to flat planting · 2015 · compared with flat planting

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Bed planting lowered the cost of wheat cultivation compared with conventional planting.

    Bed Planting A New Crop Establishment Method for Wheat in Rice-Wheat Cropping System · 1970 · compared with conventional method

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Bed planting gave maximum grain yield of 3.60 t/ha.

    Effect of Planting Method and Nitrogen Levels on the Yield and Yield Attributes of Wheat · 1970

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. positive
    Bed planting produced higher grain yield than conventional planting.

    Growth and yield potentials of wheat as affected by management practices · 2013 · compared with conventional one

    Same directionCited by this paper

  5. negative
    No N application at tillering stage decreased spikes number per m2 and seeds per spike.

    Wheat yield and grain protein response to nitrogen amount and timing. · 2011

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Grain yield under stress during tillering and jointing was 27% lower than under the nonstressed treatment I‐1.

    Winter Wheat Response to Nitrogen and Irrigation · 1988 · compared with nonstressed (I‐1)

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    NT likely decreased wheat yield.

    The impacts of conservation agriculture on crop yield in China depend on specific practices, crops and cropping regions · 2014

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Tillage treatments had no residual effect on subsequent sunflower and wheat yields.

    Tillage and Residue Effects on Wheat, Sorghum, and Sunflower Grown in Rotation · 1984

    Opposite direction

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.